<p>Critical Reading</p>
<p>It was NOT past to future.
It was diversity.
It was wry amusement, not feigned innocence. </p>
<p>Writing
The audience/crowd one was A. </p>
<p>Please add what you know. It's nice to have closure.</p>
<p>Elucidate rather than implicate... but I think I'm the only on who thought that that was an ambiguous vocabulary question hehe</p>
<p>Can somebody confirm the answers to the final Critical Reading consolidated answers list.</p>
<p>Notes are followed by //.</p>
<p>PAINTER ONE:
Bird picking at the painting was mislead
Simply=Basically
Painstaking
Wry amusement [or feigned innocence] //wry
Started with an anecdote
The watch was an anachronism
Old Master was a famous painting not earlier recognized
Rival painter was jealous [or annoyed] //He was jealous
Disdain </p>
<p>ROCK AND ROLL:
grew from dissent / became a party of everyday life
Both would agree people in the 1950s didnt know the scope of rock and roll
Quote from passage two qualified an assertion [or rebut an argument] //to qualify
Rock music is like folk artwork
Cautious [or illogical] // cautious
Barbaric
Demographics and commercial [or broader vs implications] // I think both?</p>
<p>NOMADS:
Sun imagery contrasts two different worlds
Different "specializations" contrast simple with complex [or approve/disapprove] //approve!! I told you so!!
Nomads are comparable to ecologists
Leading into discussion of diversity [or transition] //diversity
Losing diversity</p>
<p>SCIENTIFIC METHOD:
Quote showed elevated status of scientists
Question changes from tone of article from the past to present // no! Something about shifting tone.</p>
<p>I didn't miss any passage reading questions.</p>