<p>Decided to just make a thread so that we can add to whatever is missing.</p>
<p>So far:</p>
<p>SC</p>
<p>voluptuous
captivated
aloof and proud
quackery and forestall
inclusive..selection
prescient
adroit...erudition
obdurate
ruminate
meticulous, aberrant
docile
unique
cathartic
exaggerated
output, diverse
accidental, favorable
transcribed </p>
<p>Passage</p>
<p>Graveyard, policeman, landlord passage</p>
<p>The police officer was polite
Cold-blooded Rational
Another meaning in context: depends
Why does the author use something something something for lines ??-??. Answer was foreshadow
Author was captivated by Mrs.Alexander
Mrs.Alexander was proud and aloof
Author was contented</p>
<p>Blogs
Both authors talk about.. Commenting on contemporary practices
Passage 1 talks about all the benefits of a blog, and passage 2 speaks of it in ambivalence
Both authors think... That bloggers put private things on blogs.
What does the author 2 think about the characterization of strangers in passage 1? Debate between "Intrusion of personal experience" and "Good description of readers"</p>
<p>Indian singer</p>
<p>The passage views the singer in 'awe'
Why did the author use the words ??(the words really underscored the musicians skills). Dramatize</p>
<p>Traffic lights</p>
<p>The traffic engineers gained apperciable influence.
The author uses morroco to Montana to suggest that.. Traffic lights/laws had become standardized
The analogy question. States wanting worker to hold workshops.
-The author mentions the * insert guys name here* is even better at social engineering to show.. That his skills are diverse. Answer choice has diverse
-The motorists find the new laws.. They resent the new laws
-What does the author suggest about cyclists, and walkers? They have to share space(or maybe it was lanes?) with the motorists.
-What can be inferred about the discussion of bycicilist lanes? There no general consensus upon the issue.
-Why did the author add "the only law was to "keep right""? Underscored the need for more car laws.</p>
<p>Old farm</p>
<p>-Which would discredit the people in line ___ most? Finding out that the villagers bought their wheat from outside traders.
-Something about the author trying to show that there was scientific proof</p>
<p>Bioclock</p>
<p>-The author wrote this passage to. Talk about a phenomenon and all its solutions
-That author mentions long-flights to. Show that the internal clock fixes itself to the surrounding
-The scientist chose the cave because. To get rid of the sunlight</p>
<h2>-The author writes "One experiment in 1917 and another half a century later" because.. To show that there is scientific evidence, or something close to that.</h2>
<p>Photography</p>
<p>How do the two passages relate? Passage One lays out a philosophy that passage two talks about in detail
Word in context: Progression. Development was in the sentence so it leads me to believe that it was progression, and not direction.
What was the job of the author of passage 2? To capture pictures of people in certain moods/moments.
What do the authors of passage 1 and 2 agree upon? Waiting for an answer
What do the authors of passage 1, and 2, and the guy who hired the author of passage 2 agree upon? Waiting for an answer for this as well.
Which question would the author of passage 2 add to lines ??-?? Waiting for answer</p>
<p>Here is an answer I remember, but I don't know where it belongs: To qualify a statement.
I think it was quoting "if we can believe legends".</p>