<p>What’s the answer for the sentence completion about the woman soldier during Civil War? </p>
<p>K, perhaps a but off topic but my test room was excellent. There was a smart board so the proctor just brought up a stopwatch from online. Didnt need to glance at a clock or watch.</p>
<p>That google doc is both reassuring and depressing :|</p>
<p>it was candid admission, fluoride second passage was elaboration of argument from first passage. i thought it was vigilance but changed it to alacrity because the wording of the question implied a readiness and like keen mindedness which I associated with alacrity. alas, it is vigilance.</p>
<p>i think my essay was a bit off-topic</p>
<p>No, it was an unequivocal endorsement of fluoride. There is no evidence to suggest the spokesman was “admitting” anything, nor was his statement candid in the typically thought of sense of the word (i.e. implying spontaneity and bluntness).</p>
<p>The second fluoride passage was not an elaboration of an argument from the first passage. The second passage presented the argument that fluoride in water limited individual liberty and that its negative economic effects disproportionately affected impoverished families. Nowhere in passage 1 is this argument found. Rather, the discussion of fluoride’s impact on individual liberty is one of “ethical implications”.</p>
<p>for the last math fill in i put 2.66 . Now i realize that the answer is 2.67 because you have to round. Do you think that they will accept my answer? (I did the question all in my head because the time had ran out and I was on reading. So I guess i got lucky anyway)</p>
<p>Hm that’s actually a good question. I think you probably will be ok.</p>
<p>@johndreher, I think you will be fine. From past tests, I have seen that they accept 0.66 or 0.67 for 2/3.</p>
<p>thanks @mizejonathan that really took a load of my shoulders.
btw is this the US thread because my questions were totally different =S</p>
<p>Writing)
what was the answers of the passage( about the soap…)
I chose BBBCCE
and what was the “no error” choices?
I remember it was 16,17, and 25</p>
<p>@posterguy I put 1/9 as well … Should be correct</p>
<p>HELP ME ON THE ESSAY PLEASE. MY TOPIC WAS SHOULD WE TAKE EXPERT ADVICE INTO OUR DECISIONS. I WROTE HOW WE SHOULD QUESTION AUTHORITY USING THE REFORMATION AND MILGRAM EXPERIMENTS. I REALIZED THERE WASNT much stuff about “DECISION MAKING” SPECIFICALLY, SO I ADDED IT USING A CAROT INTO MY THESIS. ALSO MY MILGRAM EXPERIMENT EXAMPLES SHOWS WE HAVE TO REMAIN VIGILANT BECAUSE WE NATURALLY TRUST EXPERTS ORDERS.
THE REFORMATION ONE STATED THAT WE SHOULD QUESTION AUTHORITY BECAUSE THEY CAN ABUSE THEIR POWER.
IS THIS OFF TOPIC?</p>
<p>Assuming that you’ve got a 2360, with the score breakdown of 800 CR 800 W 760 M, how should you react?</p>
<p>What did u guys put for untolded handlers, I put uninformed</p>
<p>@PKMGSoledad you should be disappointed, that’s a terrible score.</p>
<p>Hey guys
What’s the answer for the sentence completion about the woman soldier during Civil War?</p>
<p>The answer choice was like b) circumscribe and idk, c) reinstate and mimic, d) skirm and disguise</p>
<p>I think I said circumscribe and whatever the second word was, may have been “assume”.</p>
<p>■■■■ I just realized that’s probably wrong though. You remember the exact sentence?</p>
<p>Wait a minute it wasn’t circumscribe it was circumvent. Never mind yeah “circumvent” and “assume” was the answer I believe. Phew.</p>
<p>No,but it was like
____ traditional boundary . . . ____ male identity. </p>
<p>Yeah I think you meant circumvent, not circumscribe.</p>