62 @sasp98
so it didn’t ask for a supplementary angle right?
gg
Without the an makes sense.
gg
Dude… I don’t respect you trying to cheat. I didn’t even know that there were people who did not take the test.
Well just discussing the questions here is “cheating” as well…
I think 2x+3 = 0. (I put -3/2, Damn, there goes my 800…)
I think it was “as practical and revolutionary an application of electricity as … telegraph.”
1000s digit is less than 100s & units, but greater than 10s.
@Learner12388 7968
Not 7968 but 8979 as same integers could be used twice. Nothing mentioned regarding repetition.
5827 ?
- It said the hundreds digit was GREATER than the ones digit , not greater than or equal to
Can someone please explain why the answer is “Accurate but incomplete”? Line 5-7 of passage one says they deal with abstract /complex ideas, but passage 2 says " writing isn’t as complex as constructing a building" or something along that line
as stated “1000s digit is less than 100s & units, but greater than 10s.”. hence the 100s and units are on the same level, so you can repeat to get 8979
It’s 'accurate but incomplete" since author 1 only mentions abstract things. Author 2 focuses on the difficulties of writing even factual prose, a topic that author 1 does not cover, even though the effects of writing are shared by both.
What was that one about “humorously” and “imploringly hopeless” again? I chose hopeless but alot of people are saying its humorous, which i thought of for awhile… anyone remember?
“The first thing I see when I wake up is piles of books,…(Don’t remember)… And I go right back to bed.” Humourously confessional
Does anyone remember what was the answer on the first question of proc writers passages?It asked for primary purpose or something?Was the answer to emphasize something