<p>Good luck everyone! Post all discussion related to the June 2009 ACT English Section here.</p>
<p>Did anyone else have a “section 5” in the end? What was that?
(nevermind this shouldn’t be in English)</p>
<p>I had one too! It freaked me out since I thought I skipped a whole bunch of science questions. Any ideas?</p>
<p>that was an experiment…i just bubbled C cause i didnt feel like doing it</p>
<p>there was one about adding in a clause that was like “pharmaceuticals, medicine, and chemicals.” did you guys say it should go in or not?</p>
<p>^yes i said it was relevant.</p>
<p>yay! me too. i was about to pick “no, it digresses from the main point” but then i realized that the sentence focused on “some depicted workers in other Detroit industries” so industries was actually relevant to the sentence.</p>
<p>it “explained a broad term” right?</p>
<p>yeah that’s what i just about to say…it was something like it broadened the whatever…</p>
<p>The first section had A LOT of no errors.</p>
<p>Agree/disagree?</p>
<p>agreed. i felt like every other answer was either a or f.</p>
<p>I said it wasn’t relevant but I wasn’t sure
For the one about the 27 panels…was it grammatic correctness or new information?</p>
<p>ya i got a lot of no errors too</p>
<p>There were two I was confused on. The first was (question 4 I think?) something involving a hyphen and/or a comma before a “but.” The other was some convoluted phrase towards the end in the Japanese passage about constellations. Anyone remember the answers to those?</p>
<p>Slipped into was correct, right…?</p>
<p>It was either that or “fell upon”?</p>
<p>EDIT: The one with the hyphen was correct, I believe.</p>
<p>concerto - </p>
<p>i said it was new info</p>
<p>and sorry charlie brwn, don’t remember either of those…</p>
<p>xombie, i think slipped into was right. almost positive.</p>
<p>i put 27 panels as adding new information. i also put “slipped into.” and the hyphen is correct, if you’re referring to “–not on bike, but on Luigi” or something like that.</p>
<p>what was the convoluted phrase for the japanese constellations? was it “In still other areas of Japan,” because if it’s that i just said it was correct. all the other ones looked to be wrong.</p>
<p>New info.</p>
<p>10char</p>
<p>EDIT: In still other… was correct. (At least it was better than anything else there.)</p>
<p>I think I did really well on this section. Probably a 30.</p>
<p>the thing about the guy naming it Luigi was “DELETE” right…because it’s irrelevant?</p>
<p>I think the info describing what Luigi was was relevant otherwise you had no idea what luigi was.</p>