<p>was edison and franklin intellectual
and that book about women was to show something about the genre</p>
<p>immortalix, sorry bout that. Collegeboard needs to tell all admins to give us a freakin warning when we have to stop.</p>
<p>strosfan: scientifically inclined is definitely in the article, he showed the gene map. As for philosophical, it is just a fabrication of people’s mind trying to take fate and turn it into philosophy, when in fact it isn’t.</p>
<p>i thought edison and franklin was NOT intellectual b/c it said intelligence wasn’t valued.
i put like academic accomplishments.</p>
<p>So did you guys get the </p>
<ol>
<li><p>passage 1 is current vs passage 2 is more historical context?</p></li>
<li><p>and both said no overexpanding corporations</p></li>
<li><p>and it was sales and marketing right (easiest quesiton on test?)</p></li>
<li><p>No edison was 100% pragmatism intelligence (it talked about practicality)</p></li>
</ol>
<p>Anyone agree? i need thes so far ive missed 5 for sure (out like 35 s i could miss alot more)</p>
<p>i for the intellectual question I put pratical intellectual or something is that right?</p>
<p>book one:
personal v impersonal because there was no analysis of a community impact of books, it was all still limited to the self</p>
<p>I put absolute dependability for edison and franklin. It seemed like the best choice the way the question was worded.</p>
<p>For Edison and Franklin, I put something with practical intelligence. What was sales and marketing?</p>
<p>I think the key between the philosophical and scientific answer choices were the words that followed them</p>
<p>They said</p>
<p>scientifically INCLINED</p>
<p>philosophically ORIENTED</p>
<p>I chose scientifically because I do think that he was inclined to believe science, and he was actually scientifically oriented and not philosophically. Just because it may have seemed like he was speaking philosophically doesn’t mean that he was oriented that way. I dunno just my .02</p>
<p>I didn’t put sales and marketing, I put that they were looking for pharmaceutical expertise or something because they were in fact looking for the people to confirm whether the drug was useful or not so that if it was confirmed, they could then use THAT as their marketing strategy</p>
<p>For the whale one I didn’t relate it to prosaic in anyway.</p>
<p>I was going between the awesome…fluid one to the one where the second choice was playful.</p>
<p>I picked awesome and fluid =) If that is right</p>
<p>i put individual vs. communal? not personal vs. impresonal</p>
<p>the edison one im sure its something to do with practicality since it was state in the next sentence they had to rely on others for their works to sell</p>
<p>crap it wasnt sales and marketing? now that i think about it it seems like pharmathetutical expertise (but remember they didnt follow that expertise so really it was only about sales???)</p>
<p>help? thanks</p>
<p>eg-</p>
<p>werent they looking for a prestigioius endorsement because it said that they wanted a “well-known” lab to prove their product was better than another one.</p>
<p>did some answer have the word impart it had to do with books or something</p>
<p>cricket I also put individual vs communal</p>
<p>Discussion on individual v communal or personal v impersonal?</p>
<p>its not sales and marketing …i think it was somthing like endorsement …</p>
<p>I put prestigious endorsement also. That’s the only reason they wanted a research university in the U.S.</p>
<p>i put prestigious endorsement definitely.</p>