<p>^^ nope</p>
<p>y=kx = direct proportion
y=k/x = indirect proportion</p>
<p>^^ nope</p>
<p>y=kx = direct proportion
y=k/x = indirect proportion</p>
<p>math</p>
<ul>
<li>if you fail, you must not have studied</li>
<li>t+u < 8</li>
<li>diagonal: 13</li>
<li>1.90 and 2.00 (i got 1.94)</li>
<li>lights 6</li>
<li>probability question 1/24</li>
<li>area of shaded region in the 3 circles ==> 10pi</li>
<li>Possible valuse between 35 and 350 (5x+1) ==>53 </li>
<li>y/(y+z)</li>
<li>directly proportional: 4x</li>
<li>square miles ratio: 0.4%</li>
<li>white cars: 10%</li>
<li>(k-w)</li>
<li>expressing something in a term: -4a+19</li>
<li>2s+100</li>
</ul>
<p>i got 1 wrong so far…</p>
<p>CR</p>
<ul>
<li>Acknowledge alternate view.</li>
<li>he thought there was a subtle display of emotion which may or may not have been there</li>
<li>reconciliation … insuperable</li>
<li>juror could be manipulated</li>
<li>fleeting (?)</li>
<li>fecund</li>
</ul>
<p>Yeah 4x is proportional. If you graphed it out, as x increases y does too. </p>
<p>I put concrete.</p>
<p>reconciliation … insuperable
that one is wrong</p>
<p>it makse no sense to say </p>
<p>rec⋅on⋅cil⋅i⋅a⋅tion [rek-uhn-sil-ee-ey-shuhn] Show IPA
noun
<p>was</p>
<p>in⋅su⋅per⋅a⋅ble [in-soo-per-uh-buhl] Show IPA
adjective
incapable of being passed over, overcome, or surmounted: an insuperable barrier.</p>
<p>the reconcilliation was unable to be overcome?</p>
<p>nope.</p>
<p>the correct answer is impasse and insurmountable</p>
<p>im⋅passe [im-pas, im-pas] Show IPA
noun
<p>was </p>
<p>in⋅sur⋅mount⋅a⋅ble [in-ser-moun-tuh-buhl] Show IPA
adjective
incapable of being surmounted, passed over, or overcome; insuperable: an insurmountable obstacle.</p>
<p>the deadlock was unable to be overcome vs the reconcilliation was unable to be overcome?</p>
<p>so does anyone know what question im talking about where the answer was 8 pi? it was one of the last questions on the 20 minute section i think</p>
<p>also another question on the 20 minute section, the PERIMETER was 10 pi, not the area… i think it asked for the perimeter lol</p>
<p>It wasn’t the last 3 questions…the only question I remember pi in the last 20 mins was the perimeter + 3 circle ones.</p>
<p>^
are u sure?
the last 3 questions in my memory were:
permutation of the letters
the 5x+1
a circle inside a square? or something like that</p>
<p>Yeah, I put impasse and insurmountable. The other one doesn’t make sense.</p>
<p>Hm…I don’t remember then. I remember the circle + the square question, just don’t remember the answer clearly.</p>
<p>so uhm does anyone know when we get our score back?</p>
<p>25th of June. So 19 days. (According to my timezone).</p>
<p>i dont think it was derisive - laudatory… my friends all put exaggerated - libelous if we are talking about the same question</p>
<p>no that was a diff question
and i also put that :)</p>
<p>that was the reporter’s comment were exaggerated… however they werent so much to be called libelous</p>
<p>the derisive/laudatory was the lawyer passage</p>
<p>the second passage of law stated the storytelling was a “nobel pursuit” therefore it was being laudatory… praising the passage… yeah it kinda sounded cautious cause it said “some people may abuse it” but i think it was more laudatory then cautious… who knows i may be wrong though</p>
<p>and what did u guys get for "due to her impluses… the myriad of projects… but people were surpised by her?</p>
<p>the options were like
squander… something
something and malevolence
distill and something</p>
<p>i got expend … affability…</p>
<p>the insurmountable/impasse was something different… i think it was like question 5?.. it wasnt the last one for sure lol</p>
<p>i put squander - profligate for that one. what was the 1st blank of the cautious then? omg maybe i got that wrong…ewwww</p>
<p>and is there anyone who remembers the impasse question???</p>
<p>i thnik it makes sense to say " due to her impulses she was able to expend(use) her energy on a myraid( a lot of) projects, while people were surprised at her affability(gentleness/niceness)</p>
<p>it doesnt make sense to say squander(make less)… and prolifigate(excessive, or immoral)</p>
<p>no it is def squander and profligate. squander means to use a lot, and profligate the similar meaning. so basically the woman used a lot of her energy on a myriad projects, and people were surprised at her profligacy (using a lot of energy). That was our consensus.</p>
<p>I think profligate was the answer…
squander - spend wastefully
profligate - wastefulness/extravagence.</p>
<p>She squandered her energy on a myriad of projects, people were surprised(was this the verb? don’t remember) on her extravagance.</p>
<p>Gentleness doesn’t relate to the first clause (the energy + projects)</p>
<p>yea **** i think ur right lol</p>