<p>Final two SCs!
. Some experts DISPUTE the theory that exercise has to be STRENUOUS
. Females are CRUCIAL for science not only as mentors but also for RECRUITING</p>
<p>So we now have 65 of 67!!!</p>
<p>Final two SCs!
. Some experts DISPUTE the theory that exercise has to be STRENUOUS
. Females are CRUCIAL for science not only as mentors but also for RECRUITING</p>
<p>So we now have 65 of 67!!!</p>
<p>Wasn’t there an SC answer with “Ambition” in it?</p>
<p>Yea I had those two as well.</p>
<p>The ambition one was compassion and ruthless, ambition was in the sentence itself.</p>
<p>Aha! That makes more sense. Because I remember selecting both of dark knight’s choices as answers :P</p>
<p>Any idea what the last two might be?!?!!</p>
<p>I still think that one of the answers for the boy in Argentina was domineering.</p>
<p>to simo,</p>
<p>it never said movement or "as a biologist’ in the paragraph</p>
<p>yes it did. she was a biologist.</p>
<p>ok the answer is debatable clealy</p>
<p>Didn’t one of the sentence completions have the word ‘doctored’ in it?</p>
<p>could somebody give me the questions for “familiar and over alarmed” and “problem of little concern” because I’m pretty sure they are the same</p>
<p>wasn’t that the question that asked how the second author would respond to the first author?</p>
<p>familiar and alarmist is how author 2 would respond; passage 1 presents a problem that passage 2 dismisses as of little concern is for the relationship between the 2 passages.</p>
<p>i think that the austria girl passage had 12 questions, and the talent passage had 13</p>
<p>what was experimental??
and how would one know that</p>
<p>yep, we need 2 more for the talent passage and we’re done… come on guys</p>
<p>here’s another answer from the talent passage! what does “explanation” mean </p>
<p>it meant report i believe… anyone agree?</p>
<p>actually i think the word was report and it meant explanation</p>
<p>i remember a question that asked: what does account mean?
I put explanation.</p>
<p>yea i remember that one, but there was another vocab in context one</p>
<p>@NewAccount</p>
<p>You may be right. I vaguely remember putting down an answer that had domineering in it. But I’m really not sure.</p>