<p>we already talked about Crane and Deiser. THe answer is social problems.</p>
<p>way early pages seemed like everyone confirmed it was social inequality</p>
<p>Crane and Dreiser addressed social problems I believe. What was this question for this? </p>
<p>Era of Good Feelings: Ended with destruction of the Federalist Party.</p>
<p>I don’t remember the question. Anyone know whether US History curves are still similar to the curve found in the BB? -9 = 800?</p>
<p>does anyone remember the question where they asked which of the following was not a result of the war of 1812? i put “acquiring new territories”</p>
<p>^
People have already discussed it; that is the right answer.</p>
<p>Did we add the question about sectional disputes about tarriffs during years 1828 - 1836?</p>
<p>^Thanks for catching that. I’m updating the list
I think those were two different question. One was about women in the late 19th century, and the other was about women in the 1860s</p>
<p>Anyone know if the curve for US History is still similar to the one in the BB?</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>I put that he set the standard for anticommunism policies. Not too certain on it, however.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>That’s what I put.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>If that’s the case, I think I easily got a 800. If not, at least 780. :D</p>
<p>And I don’t think we did.</p>
<p>^^^^ is right go add the two social problem writers</p>
<p>[National</a> Association of Manufacturers - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia](<a href=“http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Association_of_Manufacturers]National”>National Association of Manufacturers - Wikipedia)
I am fairly certain the AFL was mostly unskilled labor, not craftworkers as the question stated. other than that, excellent list! I only saw a few I missed.</p>
<p>@ pdawggy
pretty sure that it said the NAM represented workers of some sort which would be incorrect</p>
<p>AFL was predom skilled btw</p>
<p>For the Harry Truman question - I think the answer was that he set the precedent for communist policies</p>
<p>Does anyone remember any question that dealt with the stamp act/sugar act</p>
<p>yea i confirm the truman answer–
+2
Truman
2 writers</p>
<p>Yes, after some research it appears so. What was the curve last months? Can a -9 still be 800</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>Yeah, I remember something about the sugar act:</p>
<p>one of the answers was like:
importation of sugar</p>
<p>Don’t remember the correct answer, sorry.</p>
<p>NEW QUESTION
It was about the Chinese Exclusion Act and the answer was something like banned people of certain races and national origins. Can anyone confirm?</p>
<p>The late 19th century and the 1860s is the SAME THING!!!</p>
<p>[19th</a> century - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia](<a href=“http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/19th_century]19th”>19th century - Wikipedia)</p>
<p>add to the list</p>
<p>1828-1836 - sectional stuff about the tarriff
sugar act had something to do with customs
crane and whatshisface - social issues</p>
<p>@IMaGecko - I’m still sure that those were two different questions. I remember bubbling in both answers</p>
<p>Harambee, I confirm the Chinese exclusion act question. I agree w/ your answer.</p>