<p>There was one question that I remember had two spaces after the colon (it was choice A: correct as is type answer)--was this the right answer?</p>
<p>some kind of dress, <now worn=""> by blah blah blah...was 'now worn' wrong and should it have been worn or was that southwest dress sentence no error?</now></p>
<p>i remember that one youre talking about, Zachsta.. thats the answer i chose as well. it was weird though, and made me paranoid..bc of those spaces.</p>
<ol>
<li><p>I dont remember the question. damn.</p></li>
<li><p>I dont think I chose anything based on space between punctuation and word.</p></li>
<li><p>I dont really care. I already got a 800 in Writing. A second one would be depressing. (It wouldnt help my cumulative score)</p></li>
</ol>
<p>Tsmall, I put correct. it had to be! im hoping for an 800 on writing.</p>
<p>anyone remember the paragraph fixing thing about shy people?</p>
<p>one ofthe questions was what additional info would fit best after line 11... (2nd to last paragraph)</p>
<p>was it that he secretly is a botanist or that 'therefore some people are often misunderstood'?</p>
<p>thanks</p>
<p>I put the botanist answer for that one. It seemed to make the most sense since it said that he didn't talk much about himself and that "you would be surprised" to find out that he is a botanist, or something like that.</p>
<p>dang, i thought "now worn" only needed to be "worn".</p>
<p>guys,</p>
<p>the answer is 'therefore some people are often misunderstood' because a botanist is completely random. the topic is about ppl being misunderstood.</p>
<p>i put botanist though and i'm pretty sure it was right...i've only missed 1 writing thus far. the misunderstood thing has already been said and was redundant and did not fit.</p>
<p>I put the botanist too...The writing wasn't THAT bad...
do ya'll think it will be graded as harshly as march or more along the lines of the CB book writing scores?</p>
<p>botanish for me too...so I guess botanist wins...writing was a joke...by the way it was </p>
<p>"opposition to" not "opposition for" < original</p>
<p>***... that is SO RANDOM. i dont understand how it's that.</p>
<p>it just worked...little wierd but it did.</p>
<p>well i was stuck between the two - and was def leaning towards the botanist - but then i remember on a collegeboard,com practice test i got a similar question wrong and the explanation was something like unneeded specific information - so i just went with misunderstanding - even though it did seem somewaht akward, it did sum up the paragraph</p>
<p>but then theres probably about a 90% chance that im wrong.
jeez thats just dandy</p>
<p>botanist is wrong, positive about that.</p>
<p>lol I did not want to see that...but obv. good advice (but actually I do work in mcdonalds and taco bell as of now...maybe some of us actually want to make something of ourselves and we're not satisfied with a 600 because we know that our potential is higher than going to a community college and cooking burgers all day or makiing tacos for people)</p>
<p>no, botanist is right father.</p>
<p>It had to be because it was something like:
If you took the time to know my uncle roger--you'd know he was an accomplished botanist.</p>