<p>For the passage about the guy moving from Delhi to Calcutta, and it was asking about the contrasting was it complete and whole?</p>
<p>i think peoples was NO CHANGE and I think i put that one? if i didn’t than I put people’s
(second choice B?)</p>
<p>The other one in that passage I didn’t know was the one about the teenagers and the outreach organizations.</p>
<p>@stanford I did complete and whole
I also left the are
@jallidalli I put peoples’ I think. That was my least favorite english question
@mh I think it was B
For the calcutta one, did everyone get a lot of stay the same?</p>
<p>How many can you miss and still get a 36? Has the curve been -1 in the past?</p>
<p>I put peoples’ too.</p>
<p>I put people’s</p>
<p>People is plural so I thought the apostrophe goes after the “s”</p>
<p>I put peoples
“Peoples” can refer to a group or groups of culturally defined groups, as in the "peoples of eastern Europe.
what exactly was the sentence?</p>
<p>@seasmart:</p>
<p>uhmm the first time it talked about calcutta i think I put increase or decrease or something cuz it had less tourists than the other ones?</p>
<p>I put peoples as well. By far my least fav question :(</p>
<p>Ugh. I can’t remember what I put. I guess I could figure it out if I knew the sentence though.</p>
<p>I put peoples as well. The posessives didn’t make sense since it went with california (california’s). Also, if people’s was right, then persons’ would also have to be right and there would be 2 right answers. </p>
<p>I was just unsure because I didn’t know if peoples was grammatically correct. I thought I’d heard it in a history book though.</p>
<p>For the first question I put Whom. I’m pretty sure that the therapists was the object of the sentence.
What did you guys get for the idiom question?
was it “as itself?” or “into itself”</p>
<p>I think it was just “in itself”</p>
<p>It was in itself.</p>
<p>For the people one, I put peoples also. It was California’s peoples.</p>
<p>yea. I am pretty sure peoples is correct since it is definitely a word.</p>
<p>@kunal
I think I may have put into itself, I believe that was paralleled?</p>
<p>@ JalliDalli</p>
<p>THATS EXACTLY what I thought on that question. I thought of peoples as something like pueblo in spanish 
as well</p>
<p>I put persons’ for that question. The only one that sounded right to me. Probably wrong though haha</p>
<p>Sent from my Droid using CC App</p>