<p>I put the same for the Roman Structure and the Egyptian Book of the Dead. </p>
<p>Anyone know anything about the Cattle Ranching one? Anyone? lol</p>
<p>I put mestizos. Although Simon Bolivar was a creole, people like Father Hidalgo and that other...Jose...something were mestizos. My textbook says that the revolts were mostly caused by mestizos. That question was a little weird.</p>
<p>Sorry don't know about the cattle-ranching...I just skipped :D</p>
<p>But the scale is pretty lenient. I mean skip 15 = still 800. And by the looks of it, since everyone had trouble with the test, the scale will be a bit "lighter."</p>
<p>i really hope the cattle ranching one was argentina, west US, and north mexico or something. that one was just really weird. and also, does anybody know about why US helped germany and JApan after WWII?</p>
<p>I thought the test was really easy. I skipped one (forgot the question). And I finished in time. I practiced with the Barron SAT II world history. The barrons practice tests were MUCH harder (i got like 1/3 wrong on both practice tests) and I thought the test today was a joke compared to the barrons one.</p>
<p>someone said that colleges see ALL of your SAT IIs?</p>
<p>Can someone answer this for me? I posted this somewhere else...</p>
<p>"is it possible to see your score then cancel it or something?</p>
<p>I took the world history, think I did badly, but I'm taking 3 more next year (jr year). Will it matter that I did badly (maybe even a 550) on this world history if i do well on the next 3?"</p>
<p>No. Although colleges do look at all of your SAT II scores, I'm almost certain that they will not care if you bomb your fourth one after doing really well on the other three. They only require two or three Subject Tests, so doing badly on your fourth one shouldn't matter at all. :)</p>
<p>Oh and about the Eurasian Interaction question....I put Christianity, and it looks like Barron's does too.</p>
<p>and oh yeah... i dont really think it's because they wanted allies for the cold war.... it's more like they thought it'd be effective for containment policy... after WWII wasnt the US obsessed with containment?</p>
<p>did anybody know what the Bantung sp? Conference was?? or some plan/policy after(or b4) WWI among the nations w/ the answer choices of Marshall Plan, free agreement policy or something?</p>