<p>School: Public Magnet High School
Gender: Male
Ethnicity: Hispanic/African American
SAT Score: 2400/2400
ACT: 36/36
GPA: 3.0 UW, 4.0 W</p>
<p>AP Courses:</p>
<p>12-16(random ones) 5/5 in every single one</p>
<p>ECs: NONE</p>
<p>What about:</p>
<p>School: Public Magnet High School
Gender: Male
Ethnicity: Hispanic/African American
SAT Score: 2100/2400
ACT: 30/36
GPA: 3.3-3.4UW, 4.3-4.4 W</p>
<p>AP Courses:</p>
<p>10-12</p>
<p>4/5 in half, 3/5 in one, and 5/5 in the rest.</p>
<p>ECs:</p>
<p>A few.</p>
<p>2yrs in swimming
2 yrs in lets say band.
2yrs in Student Government
2 yrs in helping something interesting as community service</p>
<p>Which student would have a better chance?</p>
<p>These are 2 types of people as we can tell. One is a hard working involved type while the other is a smart kept to himself type. I am truly wondering whether top institutions value intelligence over involvement or involvement and hard work over intelligence. The top candidate is easily smarter than the lower candidate but the lower candidate struggles to keep everything together while the other just seems lazy with an ability to clearly do much more than the second one.</p>