<p>First LSAT I’ve taken - timed or otherwise. It’s the one from 1996 that is on LSAC.org.</p>
<li>:o</li>
</ol>
<p>Pathetic. 170--if we we're supposed to be impressed.</p>
<p>It doesn't impress me yet, why should it impress you? :D</p>
<p>I don't know why it should impress me. I thought you were announcing your arrival or something. :)</p>
<p>No, actually it's so boring at my home that I took it for fun.</p>
<p>yeah...I just took one today for the heck of it: 182. See my extra two supplement yours. Now you have officially 170. Good for you.</p>
<p>Neverborn, words cannot express how I feel about you.</p>
<p>Wow, feel the love on this thread.... :p</p>
<p>Why not, nspeds? :)</p>
<p>He can't because big-headed, pretentious, haughty, etc. aren't nearly as effective. :)</p>
<p>Want less taken-for-fun LSATs? Fast forward time to when I move to school. Peoria, IL sucks.</p>
<p>Well I took one today as well (really I actually did!) and scored a 194. Yeah that's right, I did so well and had so much time left over I started writing my own questions and adding them in. :)</p>
<p>I made a 158 and a 1400 on my first LSAT and SAT. </p>
<p>I ended up doing 20 points better on one and 200 points better on the other.</p>
<p>Suffice it to say, the only score that matters is the one that you take for real. Keep that in mind while you're busy stroking your own ego.</p>
<p>Congrats, Shiboing. Did you prepare with any professional courses like TestMasters?</p>
<p>I think he's joking. No one could be that pretentious, could they?</p>
<p>Payne: Do you mean me or Shiboing?</p>
<p>The latter, but it was a joke anyway.</p>
<p>
[quote]
He can't because big-headed, pretentious, haughty, etc. aren't nearly as effective.
[/quote]
</p>
<p>Yes. There exists a lacuna in my mental lexicon.</p>
<p>And believe me, when one exhausts my logophilia in a category – a category on which I often speak – something is amiss.</p>
<p>Neverborn, are you going to Bradley?</p>
<p>Nope! UChicago, home for the summer.</p>