Just took the SAT Biology...come hither!

<p>oh man....now i have 3 wrong......this sucks.....</p>

<p>that was the one with the plant and auxin...i think it was only enlarging</p>

<p>is it about embryo development for the flower...it was mitotic divisions.</p>

<p>Wait, so the graph didn't swoop downward?</p>

<p><em>Curses.</em></p>

<p>I thought about Auxin and how it encouraged growth.... therefore I chose both enlargement and cell division.</p>

<p>oh i didnt put cell division bc in the picture its the same number of cells, only they're bigger</p>

<p>auxin stimulates growth.</p>

<p>so cruise, the graph doesn't swoop downward?</p>

<p>i put that it did swoop downward, but the correct answer is when it goes up and then levels off</p>

<p>UGH, I made the dumbest mistaks on the biology. Did anyone do the molecular section with the question about a typical woman?</p>

<p>i put enlargment and cell division cuz the question after that talked about cell division during that stage</p>

<p>in the begining, there are matching questions about agglutination and stuff. is there more than 1 B???</p>

<p>and for the ear question, is the answer B? anyone remember?</p>

<p>I don't understand. Someone explain to me how the concentration of starch could change at all if the starch wasn't able to leave the bag.</p>

<p>And the answer to the woman question was XX.</p>

<p>Wait, even though XO is an infertile female?</p>

<p>i did molecular! Wait wait, to respond to some things. It was just cell enlargement cus auxin elongates cells...doesnt divide them. </p>

<p>So the correct answer is the graph goes up and levels off?? that wat i put but u all said i was wrong..so im confused now.....</p>

<p>Any questions on molecular that you have IvyLeague? anyone for that matter?</p>

<p>But the key word was typical. Typical woman are fertile. Not infertile.</p>

<p>XX it is yes...XO...O doesnt exist....thats a blood type ....an infertile woman would be just X, or XXX</p>

<h2>Really, the wording on these tests are so poor.</h2>

<p>XO definately does exist, what are you talking about?</p>

<p>ok i am so confused about the starch dialysis tube question with the graphs. was it asking about the concentration of water or the concentration of starch? bc if it was the concentration of water then the line would have gone up and then leveled off, but if it was starch then the line would have gone down</p>

<p>I'm almost positive it asked about starch concentration, and that's why I chose the line to go down.</p>

<p>I thought it was asking about starch. Oh no! Was it asking about water?!?!</p>

<p>i thought it was asking about starch! thats why i chose the line going down to but hten everyone said that it was about water and the line went up and leveled off</p>

<p>If it was starch, which I thought--then why wouldn't it go down?</p>