<p>Bio/Math IIC/Physics.</p>
<p>I've asked this before but that was for the book in general.. now i'm looking for practice tests, which of these have more realistic ones?</p>
<p>I'd go with pr, I've heard that kaplan is too easy. I'm not sure though.</p>
<p>Kaplan is easier, PR is a bit harder than the real thing. I'd go with PR.</p>
<p>really? cause i swear PR's bio seems alot easier than kaplans. For example, PR doesn't even test structures of the eye, and kaplan does</p>
<p>For bio they're both mad hard. Especially Kaplan.</p>
<p>For IIC, PR is good. Kaplan is not so hot.</p>
<p>Sorry, I haven't looked at their Bio books. I was just making a generalization that is true for MathIIc and Physics.</p>
<p>for math 2:
kaplan, a bit easier
pr, about the same level</p>
<p>if you r ambitious and are aiming for 750+, use barrons-it prepares you to get the few HARD questions right on the real test, but there's lots of typos/mistakes.</p>
<p>ahh i don't think i can get my hands on barrons before december, so i'll just stick with K and PR, since i have both their books for all the 3 tests that i'm taking.</p>
<p>hmm..</p>