<p>I see… and this has to do with the quality of education how? That’s what I thought.</p>
<p>It actually does. Liberal radicals have proven to have no credibility whatsoever, not even when is 2+2.</p>
<p>Nancy Pelosi is the typical San Francisco Bay Area’s product.</p>
<p>^ In fairness, the City of Berkeley is run by extreme liberals. Students at the UC are more diverse in political viewpoints.</p>
<p>Austin, TX is pretty liberal as well…but maybe not on the level of Berkeley or Santa Monica.</p>
<p>Right… in my book, they have a lot more credibility than you do.</p>
<p>Although as a Californian, I have to say I’m not a big fan of Pelosi. Even coming from the most conservative part of CA, I will still admit that Cal will give a fantastic education.</p>
<p>Jaysus, since when did Fred Phelps become a CCer.</p>
<p>The difference is that UT you will find people able to think with their mind. At Berkeley I only met indoctrinated products of radicalism.</p>
<p>^ Lemme guess… you’re going to McCombs, right?</p>
<p>Nope. Declined acceptance at McCombs to go to Rice on a scholarship.</p>
<p>I went to UT as undergrad but in engineering.</p>
<p>^ well good…you’re going/went to some great schools…no need to bash UCs.</p>