<p>Hi guys. I feel somewhat like a leech for never having posted/registered until today but i'll disregard the feeling so I can continue to leech and have my first post be a question for myself :)</p>
<p>I've gotten into several LACs, Amherst and Williams being the ones I'm considering the most, as well as into Chicago, and I plan on visiting the east (and midwest) in a couple weeks. But I just gotta ask some questions here.</p>
<p>I really want to be in a big city, i.e. Chicago. But I've heard that the five-college atmosphere isn't too rural-feeling at amherst and williams redeems itself for the community's discounted snowboarding ticket prices :) And I guess the rural feel isn't too bad if four years is compared against 22 years of life, 18 in L.A. and Las Vegas. Comments?</p>
<p>But my primary concern is on how much I will get out of whichever college I choose. I know Chicago is reputed to be more intense, but for every cramp of my fingers, will I get back in return the same amount of intellectual reward? I mean the lacs make a compelling argument. Days ago, I was set on Chicago. Strong liberal arts education, in a big city, and.. well that's enough for me. Or was enough. I'm sure Chicago has plenty of small classes/seminars, but how does the number compare against amherst/williams? Or the amount of attention given to students by faculty? Is it more individual in Chicago and is that better? I have no idea for a major, no specific goal, I just want to learn stuff and enjoy every moment of it. Which will provide me that?</p>