<p>About that Lawrenceville-Princeton faculty connection....</p>
<p>...or any Ivy faculty-Boarding School connection for that matter...</p>
<p>Are faculty salaries at Ivies able to support a BS education for one or more children?</p>
<p>Do that many faculty members have kids in top boarding schools? Now I'm sure that many of them -- who have kids -- have kids bright enough to get into boarding schools, but then you have to have kids who are also bright enough to get into the Ivy...even as a faculty member's child, which isn't exactly a cakewalk.</p>
<p>So, here's the weeding out process:</p>
<p>1) Take faculty members who have kids in one particular grade (say, HS Class of '07) and that pool is, I would think, somewhat limited;</p>
<p>2) Reduce that further to the faculty members who have financial resources to pay for a top boarding school;</p>
<p>3) Reduce that further to those who feel that a boarding school education, whether as a day or boarding student, is superior to the other local options;</p>
<p>4) And then -- assuming that all those kids are bright enough to get into the top BS -- reduce that to the kids who've attended said BS and meet whatever threshold standards apply to them for admission to the Ivy as children of faculty members;</p>
<p>5) And, finally, eliminate those students who choose to matriculate to other schools (because I would assume that there's some sort of tuition arrangement that makes it nearly as feasible for a student to attend another Ivy as it is to attend the one that their parent teaches at -- and, if so, I would think that quite a few would opt to spread their wings a little).</p>
<p>To think that year after year a school like Lawrenceville is sending off, say, a dozen kids to Princeton because those kids are faculty children seems like a high number to me. I don't have raw data, so I'm admittedly just working from my dataset labelled "The World As I Assume It To Be." But given that dataset -- that I will not make an effort to defend -- and applying it to the sieve that I use here -- which I feel somewhat confident about -- I don't see the matric numbers being skewed to any great degree.</p>
<p>Consider this to be in the form of a question/request for mo' better information and not as a rebuttal to liv&learn. I just don't get it...and would like to understand more about this dynamic we (and that includes me) keep referring to. Is it fact, highly plausible, or a CC myth that we've bought into and has credibility because we've repeated it so often?</p>