@BKSquared - Yes, of course the source I linked is the for the applicant pool, not the admit pool. Maybe I wasn’t clear enough in my post?
About “thresholds” or “hurdles,” if they exist then I have never seen a convincing explanation why there are such dramatic increases in admissions rates between the supposed threshold (or hurdle) and the upper bound. For instance, look at Harvard’s data here, which show admit rates rising monotonically with scores, literally tripling between SAT 1520 and 1600 (concorded values): http://samv91khoyt2i553a2t1s05i-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/Doc-421-145-Admissions-Part-II-Report.pdf (page 7).
What is nice about that graph is that it superimposes the number of applicants achieving those scores. You can see by inspection that the number of applicants scoring above 1520 decreases monotonically such that there are only one third the number of applicants scoring 1580-1600 as 1520-40.
Usefully, that chart excludes legacies and athletes, leaving bare the true landscape for the unhooked. Many weaker legacies are of course admitted, but the charts tell the tale of the unhooked.
We see the exact phenomenon with academic index, presented in SD terms in the immediately preceding page in that document (page 6). Here the effect is more dramatic, as the components of academic index are not perfectly correlated (although obviously positive). The last half standard deviation is where all the action is!
Now, if there were a true threshold or hurdle, we would expect to see admit rates flatten beyond it. We don’t.
The alternative explanation is that Harvard is looking for many things other than academic ability, which is of course true. But this begs the question why it is finding these other combinations in such abundance at increasingly higher scores (or academic index). Especially as the number of applicants falls off so dramatically at the higher numbers. It could simply be that Harvard values scores and AI among the unhooked more than it says (that is actually probably true).
More likely, scores also capture an underlying causal factor which is correlated with excellence in the other dimensions that it is looking for (personal, ECs, etc). It’s not too hard to figure out what it is
It is not difficult to figure out Harvard’s model of admissions here.