<p>For those who have asked whether legacy makes a difference---let me share our C's experience. C has great solid credentials, great high school, 3.9 un weighted, 90th percentile SAT, great recs, outstanding ECs (student government 4 years, great community service, 12 varsity letters in three sports, music supplement (she is an accomplished pianist), arts supplement (she does AP Art and is very talented, etc.) Major weakness in her appl was SAT II, which weren't awful, but weren't through the roof. She was in the running to be a recruited athlete---she has an AI that is high, but not through the roof, but narrowly "missed the cut" for a recruiting spot. She did have a letter of support from the coach, however. A great all-around kid, and nice to boot. (I am, of course, a bit biased.)</p>
<p>We are not development cases, but her legacy parent has given many, many, many hours of volunteer service to Princeton University, has served on millions of committees, has interviewed students for nearly 30 years. </p>
<p>Our c was waitlisted at Princeton, but was accepted to Williams, Swarthmore, Haverford, Bryn Mawr, UVA, Tufts, Vassar, Davidson, and Harvard. In all these options, athletics certainly played a role, but not a conclusive one.</p>
<p>C plans to attend Harvard.</p>