<p>Wollfy, i remember last year as SCEA decisions came out there was a thread that had stats and a lot of other information on in with decisions. I'm not sure where it is, anyone know how to find it? </p>
<p>You're probably right, though, about it being too depressing...</p>
<p>Maybe we can start a new thread, like that wiki site.</p>
<p>We should start a wiki site.</p>
<p>I agree lets make one (I dont know how mind you).</p>
<p>I think it is best not too...</p>
<p>I think I just developed acute depression from that site</p>
<p>I think we all got depression from that site. <em>faints at the sheer number of valedictorians and 800s of the 09 CC generation</em>. Which is why we should make our own - to comfort each other with our miserable stats and lack of glorious ECs such as starting a charity foundation.</p>
<p>I don't know how to make a wiki either, but I still think we should make one.</p>
<p>And I would just like to say this is my favorite board on CC. Every other forum on here is so...
And I'm saying this as an RD applicant. So even though I don't technically fit in with you guys, I feel like I fit in the most here. :)</p>
<p>well... I think your case... we will induct you, as an RD outsider, into the pantless and shoeless class of 2010 (thats when we would graduate right?) cc stanford board...</p>
<p>Yes, we would be 2010.</p>
<p>I am so honored!</p>
<p>...And I did read that thread about the shoelessness, and I am totally in.</p>
<p>It's strange, but any one of us could get into Stanford and be talking to someone else on CC without even knowing it.</p>
<p>nah if we get in we gotta do like a CC meeting at Stanford.</p>
<p>btw all this hype and this board are gonna make me utterly depressed when i don't get in because everyone seems cool and now I wont be able to do all the stuff people are suggesting.</p>
<p>Stanford application class of 2010 barefooted across the nations campuses...</p>
<p>We'll just do it wherever we go, except if it snows.</p>
<p>lol..who came up with the barefoot idea anyway?</p>
<p>Instead of a wiki site we should do the Stat Roster (like on Harvard's board). It's clearer and you can elaborate on what you've done instead of having some whack small table.</p>
<p>Don't we have one already? Perhaps it is in the archives.</p>
<p>I'll step back in and take credit for the barefootedness.</p>
<p><em>bows</em></p>
<p><em>Humbles it only rock and roll</em></p>
<p>We should make a stat roster, just a better one than the one at the Harvard board.</p>
<p>And I thought it was someone's uncle or something that did the barefootedness? He's my idol.</p>
<p>so does anyone have the skill to make a wika site or a stat roster, cause I see a lot of talk but no one coming forward.</p>