<p>And here is link to june 2012 thread : <a href=“http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/sat-act-tests-test-preparation/1348140-sat-1-june-2012-a.html[/url]”>http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/sat-act-tests-test-preparation/1348140-sat-1-june-2012-a.html</a></p>
<p>If anyone knows about the curve, do share :)</p>
<p>On the picture there was only half of the circle</p>
<p>wat about the question divisble by 3?</p>
<p>This is what I got from the CC discussion of 2012 June SAT (US). Do you guys agree?</p>
<p>Passage 1 and Passage 2</p>
<p>idealistic
realistic
fund./simply
civics/and career of childrens
helping children with their interests
snide
higher education
anticipate/response
repetition
objectionable, systematic</p>
<p>Mini</p>
<p>Dramatic
pivotal to world success</p>
<p>defining a quality
pivotal to the world</p>
<p>Mini
question/response
Sensory-
why he had use electric
different perspectives</p>
<p>Long Passage:</p>
<p>obedient bully commanding adamant cooking conflict resent criticism familiar experiences CLOse attention rising indignation</p>
<p>provide a context </p>
<p>Long P:</p>
<p>hard to believe
recent info
novices alike
planets clear
eflective informstive
comical anecdote
emphemeral
s
LONG P:</p>
<p>novelty
pompous and stuffy
evocative
atypical
correct
holds</p>
<p>Sentence ComP :
adequate pinpoint
shortcomings
easygoing
disconcert/furnish
peremptory/ordeal
eludes (“the newest latin american paintings _____ easy classification because of the many eccentric designs” or something)
assiduous
primacy
trifling
confounded inscrutable
neophyte
circumvent
flop
consensus/dislikely</p>
<p>comparing astronomers to musicians: share similar experiences as novices
-simile between sky and lens: there is a perfect spot for viewing
-reflective and informative
-shares a special account
-ephemeral but powerful</p>
<p>understandably unreliable</p>
<p>Since I thought the one with duck picture is experimental, i didn’t touch the section, at all.
Am i to be penalized for not solving it??
If so, by how much?</p>
<p>no penalty for skipping the experimental section…no worries</p>
<p>According to the jun 12 thread, I ****ed up CR and made 2 mistakes on the Maths portion.</p>
<p>ARE the answers above all correct?</p>
<p>I thought that the academy (army) was Pedantic, and the professor used …reasoning. It did not sound lie repetition to me</p>
<p>Also seemed like reasoning to me</p>
<p>It’s definitely reasoning , repetition…I suspected that at first but repetitions is only used in one sentence not the entire 30 or so lines and how can you view the army as “snide”. I put pedantic.</p>
<p>I put pedantic too. Have any one remembered the question for the answer “novelty” “trifling”?</p>
<p>@popurban i remembr dat question…the req area=area of semicircle-area of triangle…ans is (a) ie=50pi-96
And d (b) option was 50pi-120</p>
<p>I thought that they had given a full circle for that question, so unwittingly wrote 100pi-96.(It was a FULL circle, right?)</p>
<p>For the us version writing section 6, what did you guys put for 28 (adults with back problem one) and 29 (the two gemstones one) and the one about the town council and plastic bags…for section 10 number 13 (99% extinct) was it a or b</p>
<p>Sorry first writing was section 5</p>
<p>I was really troubled by that one. I just put B.</p>
<p>Did anyone have the math (section 3 for me) where the 2nd question was:
chemical C costs 89$/milliliter and then how much does a 3% solution of it cost? - or something like that</p>
<p>because I could not get about five of the last problems in that section…Im hoping it was experimental?</p>
<p>@shs2015:</p>
<p>28 - D (they have multiple backS), 29 - E (no error), 99%- A (or whichever answer had the YET it it)</p>
<p>And what about the one about plastic bags and the council postponing other decisions I section 5… Was it but or however</p>