<p>list your guy's test formats</p>
<p>1: essay
2:critical reading
3:math
4:math
5:writing
6:critical reading
7:math
8:critical reading
9:math
10:writing</p>
<p>so i think 4 was student produced answers</p>
<p>so either 3 or 4 expermiental??...what do u guys think?.....</p>
ajsz033
October 10, 2009, 10:32pm
2
<p>I had math too. One section was significantly harder than the other w/ similar problems. It was really off.</p>
NFFF344
October 11, 2009, 12:54am
3
<p>i had writing for exp</p>
<p>I had an extra math section, first math section was redonkulous. Totally threw me off guard but the last 3 were great</p>
<p>was that the math section with the hexagon and the diagonals</p>
<p>I had two math sections with grid-in questions. Is only one section with grid-ins counted?</p>
<p>if it’s experimental, was it supposed to be hard??</p>
<p>Was the real Writing section the one about CARS/Hybrids/Electric cars etc…?? - questions 30-35??</p>
<p>IRunShow, yeah, I am positive that was the real one, and the trubadur crap was the experimental, it was way harder…</p>
<p>If I had 2 math sections that both had grid-ins, does that mean one of them was experimental?</p>
<p>I had Writing as experimental. Hopefully it wasn’t the one with the hybrid cars… coz that one wasn’t as bad as the other… the third section I think (the one with the poems and something)</p>
<p>so can expermental sections be harder than usual?</p>
<p>^^ Yeah, I think they usually are harder than usual. (sorry about the redundancy! lol)</p>