I think the terms Reach, Target, and Safe might be too confusing for what we’re looking for. So in terms of affordability, I’ll call them Automatic, Competitive, and Slim.
The Automatic schools then are those that would automatically offer at least full tuition (or there-abouts) based on her grades, ACT, and/or NHRP. Or, for UCI, based on in state tuition and living at home.
Those schools are (8 total) : Kentucky, Nebraska, Arizona, Arizona State, New Mexico, Alabama, Alabama Hunstville, UC Irvine
The Competitive schools are those where she would have to compete for at least a full tuition scholarship.
Those schools are (28 total) : USC, Cal Tech, Harvey Mudd, Colorado School of Mines, UCLA, UCSD, Virginia, Pittsburgh, Boston University, Northeastern, RPI, RIT, Georgia Tech, Vanderbilt, Stevens Institute of Technology, Maryland, Rose Hulman, Johns Hopkins, Ohio State, Purdue, Utah, Franklin Olin, Clarkson, Rice, Delaware, Tulane, Illinois Institute of Technology, West Virginia.
The ones with a * by them also have women’s D1 hockey
There’s actually at least a couple that I’d label as both Automatic and Competitive - those that give large amounts for grades/ACT/NHRP and appear to let you stack them with other awards. Those schools are (2 total) : Miami Ohio, and South Carolina
Then there’s the “Slim” elite schools that offer no merit aid.
Those schools are (5 total) : Stanford, Cornell, Princeton, Harvard*, MIT
That narrows down the original list to 43, which needs to be narrowed down by another 20 or so. So how to pare down the list? Here’s my logic, which borrows a lot from many extremely helpful suggestions from this thread. I’d appreciate any suggestions or flaws seen in my logic…
Seems like a good old fashioned ranking is in order. Obviously this is very subjective - things like third party rankings for their engineering program (like from US News, which I know is somewhat arbitrary), school features (honors program, Co-op opportunities, ABET accreditation), school location, and maybe even a random number generator. Then, it would seem to make sense to eliminate some schools if they are lower ranked than one of the Automatic schools. For example, I’ll use Kentucky as the baseline : good school, full tuition, and $10,000 housing stipend for the first two years makes it’s cost very attractive. I think this is the best “Automatic” school on the list in terms of price. Therefore, if any other school ranks lower than Kentucky, it can probably be eliminated.
There’s also timing. For some schools, we will want to get applications submitted in the next month or so. Others can wait (such as the Slim/Elite schools) that have later deadlines and since they offer no merit aid there’s no point in killing ourselves with an early application. That gives us more time to focus on those schools later.
And as far as the “Competitive” schools go, we need to somehow get a feel for just how good her chances are of getting one of their top merit aid awards (or stacking merit aid). For example, some emphasize academics over volunteer/leadership aspects (and vice versa). Some also have very few scholarships for a very large applicant pool. And some from commenters here that just know a schools merit aid generosity is different from what they list on their website.
I guess I better get crackin’ in this long and arduous process! I should probably also re-read this entire thread to make sure I haven’t missed anything…