@sybbie719 There is one college, a moderately selective one, which has had 18 applicants from my son’s HS (per Naviance) in the past 5 years. Students’ scores had quite a range. 2 were accepted. 16 were wait listed. None rejected. In my son’s eyes, it made the school look lazy - not like they were working hard at all, actually. On paper, that school was a decent fit for my S20, but he rejected it for that reason. Off the list immediately. If they can’t be bothered to sift through apps to at least reject students who should be rejected, what else are they lazy about?
Is he wrong with that conclusion? Maybe. But he isn’t the only high stats kid from our HS (which limits apps to 10) who drew that conclusion. An app for a kid from our HS is expressing interest because each app has to count. For Most kids, each app is quite carefully selected.
If colleges really cared about ‘fit’ and the perfect combination of individuals for their community, there are many things they could do better to ensure that. If they don’t, then this practice is all about yield control and their own brand protection. They are putting additional onus on applicants and it doesn’t make them look special. (For the record, I have communicated my son’s reaction to our Naviance history for this school to the admissions department and assistant coach who came to watch a state play-off game this Fall).
The OP’s daughter is very special. She is applying to colleges - supposedly educational institutions. Her being able to win a full scholarship anywhere at all shows how special she is. She is the consumer here, paying with her time and commitment if not her $. There are 3,500+ colleges in the US. Any college which gets an app has received plenty of interest. Their getting their heads turned by a kid who sends an email and asks questions makes them look pretty easily-swayed, if you ask me.
The stakes for my son in choosing to not play that game were low; he’s a high stats, full-pay kid who was repelled by any attempt at all to communicate elitism during his college visits. As he said, ‘it is just college; they need to get over themselves.’ The OP’s daughter is not as fortunate to be able to think that way and I get that. But she is a rarer and more special kid than mine, and if the ‘system’ rewards something as superficial and easily-faked as showing interest, then the system is broken.
My S20 doesn’t want HIS ring kissed, either. He wants to be judged by his academic achievements within the context that he achieved them (his EC’s). He wants that and the words from his teachers and GC to be used to judge him, not things which can easily be faked (interest and essays can be out-sourced). Too many identical applicants, they say? Then flip a coin; don’t rely on something stupid like sending emails, opening emails, clicking on links and liking FB pages. It cheapens the process and the colleges which over-rely on it. At least be honest and stop spouting nonsense about their careful ‘holistic’ selection process if in reality a robot can be used to push a kid over your line.