<p>If they have been filing as separated for several years, they have saved a lot in taxes, most likely. I can tell you that we would. Working for the same company one can even decide how to split the incomes the most beneficial ways so that tax credits, earned income status, etc are the most beneficial.</p>
<p>For financial aid? Well, the only grant that is guaranteed is PELL and with a zero EFC, that is $5600. I don’t think most people are so savvy about fin aid that they are going to try to game this --I only know one person who has done this and they did it legally. But to be legally separated (and that’s according to the state definition and some states are wide open about this) one can really net a lot of money. Seriously, what do you think will be gained in having the parents just file as separated in terms of fin aid? The most I see is eligiblity for work study maybe and some subsidized loans. If the income is so low to be PELL eligible, a college may want to see where the income is coming from to support the life style. </p>
<p>On the other hand, I do know folks who are “separated” for tax purposes. Makes a huge difference in taxes. And whatever benefit comes down the FAFSA pipe is part of the goodies, but really, such couples cannot file FAFSA as married without running into verification snags if the federal taxes are being filed as separate singles. </p>
<p>My friend was separated for a number of years before the actual divorce for health insurance, social security and a number of reasons. In her state, one can be deemed separated without doing much of anything. Just having separate residences and separate finances will do it, and that they had. It was also a great for tax purposes, since the money he sent her was diverted to her income and out of the top marginal tax rate of his. She got the head of household designation, because he made so much money that all of his exemptions and a lot of the deductions were phased out or eliminated at his income bracket, so she took on those expense and took the deduction. Their being separated meant about $20K less that had to go to Uncle Sam and even more of a savings since state taxes came into play too . Also her income was low enough that some finacial aid was available for the one kid who did go to a state school. The one who went to the private, nope, not a dime of aid, since dad made a lot of money. But even the non state school kid got loan subsidized and work study since the FAFSA EFC so warrented it, thought the school wouldn’t give any of its own money for aid.</p>
<p>If the family is PLANNING this for 2013, they are commiting fraud for tax purposes and yes, it will benefit them likely more in that venue that in school fin aid, and the “separated” designation would depend on the state definiton. I believe, Texas, PA, DE, GA, MS are some states that won’t have it. You are not considered legally separated. Other states just require you to live in separate domiciles and as separated people. No state will condone it if examination shows its just for tax purposes you are doing this and you are not really living in a separate domicile or only for work purposes and you are in each other’ s lives as a married couple. And, yes, the IRS does check on suspicous such cases (when the money is enough to warrent a check).</p>