macbook good enough?

<p>

That’s for work. I’m referring to the consumer market. In the commercial market, there are people paid to make purchasing decisions.</p>

<p>

Virtualization seems to still be limited to the commercial market though. I don’t see it being necessary in the consumer market. A big reason for using virtualization is to provide backwards compatibility, which businesses need. Apple has proven that consumers don’t care about backwards compatibility, though. They regularly drop support for old standards/features with no repercussions.</p>

<p>

Most popular consumer applications support 64-bit now. Ironically, one of the most popular Windows applications that didn’t support 64-bit until a year after Vista’s release was iTunes. But now that’s been solved, I’m not sure if there are any common applications that don’t support 64-bit.</p>

<p>

Not exactly. It’s the integration between the OS and the hardware. Ever tried setting up a Hackintosh? It works horribly, and rightly so. Apple supports only Apple hardware; it makes hardware support much simpler than it is in Windows.</p>

<p>

It’s not like 32-bit isn’t available anyway. There are plenty of computers with 32-bit Windows available, at your local big box electronics store or online.</p>

<p>

My point is that with something as complex as electronics, the quality of the product isn’t nearly as important as the marketing when it comes to sales. Apple manages to grab the consumer’s attention and hold it in a way that no other OEM seems to be able to do. The Vista disaster contributed greatly to their success as well, of course.</p>