<p>Well, the letter came today from the admissions office, and we all gathered 'round and opened it to much fanfare, and the decision was…</p>
<p>Nothing. They’ve asked him to send an updated transcript at the end of the semester. To which I say, “Huh?”</p>
<p>He’s got good grades, high test scores, solid ECs. He even attends a math/science magnet school; what could be a better match for an engineering college? There was no essay to botch, no recommendation required. Why might he have been deferred? (They don’t call it that, but that’s what it is, right?)</p>
<p>I’ve come up with two possibilities:</p>
<p>1) They worry that he’s underqualified.</p>
<p>Even though his overall GPA is above 3.5 unweighted, and he has a number of APs and concurrent-credit courses, the semester C from freshman year and semester D from sophomore year on his transcript (both in non-academic classes before he got to the math/science school) spooked them, and they want to see if he can sustain his performance at its current level.</p>
<p>2) They worry that he’s overqualified.</p>
<p>Kids from his school with his stats usually attend somewhat more highly-ranked colleges. In order to avoid wasting a slot on someone who will probably end up somewhere else, they’re asking him to re-submit his transcript in a couple of months, on the assumption that if he does, then he’s serious, and if he doesn’t, then he never was. I can imagine this being a problem with Mines, since their application is so easy and free. I’m sure a lot of people apply who have little interest in attending, but just want another admission under their belts. Then again, maybe Mines does this specifically to reduce their admission rate. Get a lot of people to apply, then reject most of them, thus improving their selectivity.</p>
<p>Which of these two scenarios do you think is more likely? Are there other possible explanations? What an anticlimactic letdown.</p>