<p>^No, everyone got that one Opie, so it’s counted.
Also, wasn’t the Imagine! question like the easiest one? That shouldn’t even be debatable.</p>
<p>For the unpretentious one, I put mimicry because I thought he did realism which essentially is mimicry. I guess I got it wrong.</p>
<p>Imagine! was located in the passage after the sailors had already reached the island, and the option was about the sailors seeing land. That part of the passage was meant to correlate with the sailors find all the fruits.</p>
<p>for the imagine question</p>
<p>I was between two choices</p>
<p>one was like “to allow the reader to see it”</p>
<p>the other had “sailors” in it</p>
<p>dblazer- I think the “mimicry” answer choice claimed that he was “mimicking” other styles though, which is incorrect because the passage stresses that he was uninfluenced by what he saw in England.</p>
<p>No, they’re counting it. The section they’re not counting includes the one about the man with his daughter Yo, the internet blogs, and animal migration.</p>
<p>What was the question for sentence completion with the answers fascinated/prospects?</p>
<p>H.G. Wells had a fascination for technology because of its prospects for humanity.</p>
<p>Wait, what section are they not counting?</p>
<p>@Opie: When they say they only grade three sections, they mean that they don’t grade the experimental section. Because the Africa section was not experimental, they will grade that.</p>
<p>Thanks MattNC, organism, and dblazer</p>
<p>what was the answer to the last question bout dinosaurs i think i put that it confirms a previously held belief</p>
<p>It didn’t confirm a previously held belief: it was new information about dinosaurs and how they walk with their heels downward or something to that effect.</p>
<p>anyone remember any more?</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>no i def put heels first as an answer to a different question im talking about the last paragraph where it shows how birds are actually similar to dinosaurs</p>
<p>dblazer: i put imitate for the realism question too, i really thought that none of those things were given in the lines referenced</p>
<p>It doesn’t confirm a previously held belief, that’s for sure.</p>
<p>I believe it was revealing something new about dinosaur movement.</p>
<p>boston1993, I got that too</p>
<p>Consolidated List</p>
<p>Vocabulary - NO EXPERIMENTAL ANSWERS
Chagrin
Unfailing
Fascinated/Prospects
Disingenuous
Trendsetter
■■■■■■/Rancidness
Characterless
Caustic/Obstreperous
Resplendent
Adept/Pantheon
Stigmatized/Vindicated
Superficial/Cursory
Autobiographical
Feigned/Hypocrisy
Proficient/Repertory
Salutary/Unconventional
Conversant</p>
<p>Passages - NO EXPERIMENTAL ANSWERS</p>
<p>Effects of TV on Courts Double Passage
Both authors granted concessions
Both authors drew comparisons
Both authors agree media coverage of courts could be educational
Ill-advised is what Judge thinks the plan proposed by Passage 1
Stage means phase
Common - cameras will eventually become
Two passages disagree on the proportion of issues that are important in televised court</p>
<p>Story of Africa Passage
Boundaries were part of the natural setting
Landed means arrived
Marked means delineate
Europeans had assumptions of what gardens were supposed to look like
Wonder is tone of sailors
“Story began 500 years ago” amends a previous assertion
Author did not appeal to an authority
Legends fill in for blank areas in map</p>
<p>Storytelling Passage (Short)
Used skills in writing learned as a child
Cadences to imitate natural storytelling i.e. rising, falling</p>
<p>TV Dinners Passage (Short)</p>
<p>Main Idea- to dispel a common misconception
reference to broccoli- provide an example/nature of fresh foods (need more debate on this)</p>
<p>Painter passage
Admiration is tone of author
Unpretentious manner is the style of the painter
Artistic weaknesses are shown by the bad copies of B Franklin
Desire to share knowledge
Decorative style of England contrasted painters style</p>
<p>Dinosaur passage
Unexcited - the authors attitude toward “secrets”
Movement in the ground is similar to movement in the air - Reason for excitement of new discovery
The new discoveries contradicted the computer models
movement of the bird’s feet in the air.
human footprint in wet vs dry soil- provides an example people can relate to to illustrate the point
Dinosaur’s lower their feet first
Scientist’s method: experimentation and extrapolation
Research overshadowed previous interest in mammals
The dry footprints were valuable but not noteworthy
Author explains definition of trace fossil to prevent misunderstanding
Research findings revealed something new about dinosaur movement</p>
<p>Adapting Films Passage:
First author was conflicted, second was assertive
Author 1 would disagree because people want to see accurate adaptations
Passage 1 defends a qualified position, Passage 2 rejects it</p>
<p>Which sentence is “characterless” in.</p>
<p>dinosaur:</p>
<p>question about: Couldn’t come up with a conclusion from 2d models until compared w/ computer models</p>
<p>africa author:</p>
<p>i think the specific words were something like
“Amended previous assertion”</p>
<p>CAN ANYONE CONFIRM THE Adapting Films Passage? WHICH ARE THE RIGHT ANSWERS, aRE YOU SURE? WHAT DID EACH OTHER TRY TO SAY(SUMMARY PLZ)?</p>