<p>Can someone post the questions for European contrasting and for the mammals question ? What would 4 wrong be? 770?</p>
<p>Sententia: I wouldn’t necessarily call it an exaggeration… I remember deciding between the two answers, and looking at the question (where it asked for why “primarily” the author put the broccoli in the passage) and I believe that he definitely did it to make a general point about the nature of fresh foods, thus furthering his argument about why TV dinners are more nutritious. Simply offering one example of a maligned vegetable wouldn’t be beneficial towards his argument.</p>
<p>I had the same reasoning as alihaq.</p>
<p>so what’s the answer to that question then?</p>
<p>^Which question? The broccoli one? The answer is still in contention- either “maligned vegetable” or “nature of fresh foods”.</p>
<p>For that Dinosaur one…shouldn’t the exact wording of the answer be that the “heel”, not the feet comefirst?</p>
<p>^ i agree, the answer said heel</p>
<p>^You are correct.</p>
<p>Another question in the dinosaur passage was about when the people ignored the fossils and physical evidence to go track the footprints…was this one because there was an exciting discovery?</p>
<p>Communist: Yeah there was a debate about this around 10 pages back. No one bothered to change it. And yes, you are right about the new exciting discovery.</p>
<p>n0va: Not the africa passage, it was a guy writing about himself, and how he writes autobiographies not because he’s famous or wants publicity, but for self education. I’ve definitely heard of some different experimental sections though.</p>
<p>What were the other choices for the broccoli passage?</p>
<p>Yeah, it’s the exciting discovery one.</p>
<p>^Other choices for the broccoli question in contention? I don’t believe any of the other answers came close to being correct, just the two we are debating between.</p>
<p>-Does anyone remember some of the other answer choices for the salutary/unconventional question? It was the medical doctors and art therapy but I don’t remember what I chose (maybe someone could help jog my memory).</p>
<p>-How about the stigmatized/vindicated q? I’m forgetting the Q on that…</p>
<p>I think I’m looking at between -1 and -4, no blanks.</p>
<p>sententia: Oh that passage seems ridiculously familiar. Can’t remember any questions from it though. Stupid memory. >.<</p>
<p>The stigmatized/vindicated was something about someone being guilty and then released. Something to that effect.</p>
<p>Im totally sure i have seen the camera in courts passage before…i just don’t know where…</p>
<p>If the wording of the other choice really was “provide an example of a maligned vegetable”, my memory could just be failing me. “Nature of fresh foods” makes more sense in that case.</p>
<p>@alihaq: thanks for posting the choices.
I chose “nature of fresh foods” because “maligned” seemed too harsh. (I knew it meant something bad, and I just checked a couple online dictionaries. It means harmful/evil.)</p>
<p>Any more input from anyone else on this thread? Do you guys remember what you put?</p>
<p>^I used similar thinking as well. Although the author did seem fairly antagonistic towards fresh food… lol</p>
<p>haha that’s true. The SAT writers always pick the weirdest passages. >.<</p>