<p>It said cameras not even film cameras. That answer was definetely wrong</p>
<p>^I thought it was implied in the passage that the camera was film camera.</p>
<p>On the sat u can’t assume they mean film cameras. It just said cameras. Plus the majority of the passage talked about televising tv. I don’t think the second author really stressed cameras at all</p>
<p>so then wuts the right answer…
thats the only one that actually worked</p>
<p>Tv production was the right answer.</p>
<p>tv production was not a choice
or if it was it was prbly worded in a way that made it wrong
i remember staring at that question for like 5 mins
im liek
100% sure its cameras</p>
<p>TV production was def wrong. It didn’t even mentioned court trials… it just said TV production, which could refer to anyone.</p>
<p>I’m almost positive that the right answer was cameras in the courtroom.</p>
<p>It was “The use of cameras in courtrooms”, the exact answer…nothing about distraction…</p>
<p>Yeah, Vlectric is right. The TV Production answer choice did NOT mention CourtTV or anything to do with trials. It is wrong.</p>
<p>yeah I don’t remember anything about distraction</p>
<p>I don’t even remember the exact answers to that question anymore, so I guess we’ll have to wait till April 1st to see.</p>
<p>From the dinosaur passage, one of the answers is:
The new discoveries contradicted the computer models</p>
<p>What was the question for this? What were the other answer choices?</p>
<p>It mentioned televising courts in both passages. One talked about how it was dumbing it down to “voyeuism” because ppl watched just because they were nosey. The other one said the use of tv educated people so that they would think courts were different from law and order. The second author barely mentioned cameras if at all and the question didn’t even say tv cameras and, as my tutor taught me, u can’t make assumptions on the sat. Televising court was the answer</p>
<p>The Passage to Africa passage totally murdered me =\ Too bad it wasn’t experimental!</p>
<p>TV Production is right because the second passage didn’t touch on cameras</p>
<p>Thank u Chicago.</p>
<p>can someone predict how many you need to have gotten right for an 800 to a 600? I really have no idea. definitely didn’t get an 800…=P</p>
<p>
No it’s not. Because the TV production answer didn’t even mention courtrooms and a camera is a metonym for television.</p>
<p>The second court passage said “so are cameras in courts good or bad?”, and then proceeded to recommend letting judges decide.</p>
<p>The use of cameras does not imply tv. And it was tv producion of trials</p>
<p>Whoa</p>
<p>Can anyone clarify the question that is being debated here and the two main choices?</p>
<p>Im confused about the question asked.</p>