I think this is the most important line to date:
So the idea is that the MM is an extra year of school for the kid to make up their mind? Sometimes 25% more schooling helps with this, but mroe often it doesn’t.
I’ve been kind of going “hmmmm…” throughout this thread. There are a lot of flags, and while they may not be exactly red, they might be pink. Perhaps dark pink.
First, for a job composing music, I can think of no job requiring a MM over a BM. It’s not a line of work that pays a lot to credentials. Teaching, yes, credentials matter, but at the college level, a masters is not a doctorate, and many - probably most - places are looking more towards having some real-life experience in their faculty. A Masters will help the career progressing if he decides to teach high school, but it doesn’t have to be in composition.
There are fewer fields more competitive than commercial music. The OP’s kid might not want a cut-throat environment (who would?) but it’s merely postponing the inevitable. There are many more people who want jobs composing music than there are available jobs.
“Financial aid” isn’t really a thing in graduate schools. You have assistantships and fellowships. The former requires some work for the department, and the latter does not. Fellowships are rare - really rare. Where I want tyo grad school, maybe 2% of the students got them, and they were one-year, after which you went on an assistantship. This is a well-funded department, and typically music is not. For assistantships, they very from half-time covering tuition plus a stipend to quarter-time, covering half-tuition and a smaller stipend. This work could involve TA’ing, being an accompanist (which is more work than it sounds!) and the like. So it’s not really about “generous aid” - it’s about how many assitantships there are, how much they cover, what the competition is like, and so on.
Supply and demand tells you that the odds are best with large undergraduate porograms (demand) and small graduate programs (supply). The problem with this is that small graduate programs accept few students (small, right?) so there aren’t so many slots for this. There will be more than a little needle-threading going on.
Same argument - a school with a high proportion of fellowships (e.g. Yale) will have a lot of competition for admission.
I would turn this around. They should figure out exactly what they want out of an MM program, identify likely candidates in conjunction with Hartford, and then and only then look at how students are supported. After all, if they don’t have what you want, it doesn’t really matter how good a deal it is.