Math 16B: Harrington or Scanlon?

<p>Aww, lectures aren't that bad. I mean, stone soup, that's a good analogy!!
Haha, I'm just kidding. But I do feel like lectures are marginally helpful if I read the book beforehand so I'm going to keep going.</p>

<p>HAhahahahaa STONE SOUP!! LOL I took a picture of it.</p>

<p>I like how he writes big. I always end up with <2 pages of notes. Compared to last semester's erm...6-10 pages (Lam).</p>

<p>for harrington: what do your gsi's do in section?</p>

<p>all we do is group work the whole time with a quiz at the end :[</p>

<p>In my discussion section, we just go over homework with a little bit of lecturing stemming from the homework problems. After that, we have a quiz. I guess that's good for me since the quiz is based on homework problems and we're going most of the homework problems... answers! But seriously, I like lecturing better so I don't really appreciate this method. :&lt;/p>

<p>bumppppppppppppppppppppp for those still taking the class How is each professor?</p>

<p>Harrington’s test are easy because he tells us exactly whats gonna be on it and gives up practice problems. However, his lectures are super boring.</p>

<p>by the way, anyone have a sample final for harrington?</p>

<p>Ditto what WorkEthic said.</p>

<p>yeah, I’m a bit disappointed he won’t make a sample final for us :frowning: – or at least some of the questions will be ‘harder’</p>

<p>Well, he will be giving out a sample for questions 1-4 so it isn’t too bad. I hope he isn’t going to make it that much “harder.” It would suck if he wanted to drag grades down because the midterm scores were so high. :&lt;/p>