Math 2 Prep Books vs. Actual Test

<p>Alrite guys, I need some input on the practice books I spent HOURS with before the Math 2 test today.</p>

<p>I had 3 books: Kaplan, Sparknotes, and Barrons. </p>

<p>I did fine on Kaplan and Sparknotes (750-800) and awful on Barrons (650-700). But according to everyone on CC, the Barrons book was a lot harder than the actual test, so I was pretty confident going into the test today.</p>

<p>But when I took the real test today, I thought it was only a little bit easier than Barrons. Does anyone agree with me....or did I just choke and screw up for no reason?</p>

<p>Thanks.</p>

<p>i def agree. just slightly easier than barrons. at lot harder than PR and Kaplan. one word: ****. lol</p>

<p>Hmmm I thought it was a lot easier than Barrons. I only left 2 blank today, as opposed to the 6 or 7 in Barrons. I think Sparknotes was pretty accurate.</p>

<p>It was about 100x easier than Barrons and a little easier than Meylani's. (I'm weird by the way. I find Meylani to be relatively easy compared to Barrons. My brain is retarded.) PR is pretty much the same as today's test, which btw, was REALLY easy compared to all the past ones... </p>

<p>Buy Meylani. It's good because it makes you actually THINK in the right manner. Barrons is just weird...but that might just be me.</p>

<p>alritey...it's weird how everyone has different opinions on its difficulty... i guess i'll buy meylani for my retake.</p>