<p>To complicate things: my daughter, who was accepted to Barnard RD and has since graduated… took AP Psych her junior year and no math. No math senior year either. She had geometry in 9th grade, and algebra II in 10th… and that was the end of math. (She went abroad for a semester foreign exchange in 11th grade, so actually only took 1 semester of AP Psych; there was a math class while abroad but it doesn’t equate to anything on in a US math track & was taught in another language in any case – I assume that at best my daughter learned some math vocabulary words in the foreign language).</p>
<p>Anyway, the point is that my daughter did exactly what the admissions officer recommended against in the post above, and she got accepted into Barnard.</p>
<p>But here is the difference: My daughter did not choose her curriculum in high school based on whether she could get into Barnard or any other college. Once she decided she wanted to do the semester-long foreign exchange, the issues shifted to figuring out how to meet all the high school’s minimum requirement to graduate in 4 years. The time abroad meant giving up on a lot of options, especially when it came to AP and honors classes. We did not know what that would mean for college admissions, and my daughter was willing to take the risk that her time abroad would hurt her chances down the line of getting into an elite college. </p>
<p>I think the fact that my daughter was clearly willing to take risks was one of the “hooks” that got her into Barnard and other top colleges. But she also had a really strong GPA, and was tied with one other student for #2 spot in her class at the time she applied to Barnard. </p>
<p>So the point is, these questions need to be answered on an individual basis – you can’t simply look at the advice someone else was given. In a sense I think that Count’s daughter was given “here’s how to look like everyone else” type advice – in other words, the standard advice that might be given to all students, but doesn’t really confer an admissions advantage. I don’t know what advice my d. would have been given if she had laid out her study-abroad plans her sophomore year and asked Barnard’s advice – probably something along the line of “you’re nuts” - but my d has been ignoring other people’s advice her whole life. </p>
<p>With your stated goal – you need a very strong first semester for Barnard – I’d think that for YOU, the best route would be the safest for your goal of boosting your GPA-- go for the regular calc course and get the A. Then Barnard sees a history/english student who continues with a 4th year of math – and challenges herself in other ways (presumably with AP English and honors/AP courses in areas of strength). A “C” in AP Calc could send the message that you are a serious student, but don’t quite have the ability to do well in a challenging environment … which does NOT help. In other words, the potential C in the AP class hurts more than the AP designation helps. (I mean, regular calculus isn’t easy)</p>
<p>If you had a STRONG GPA going into Senior year, then the best admissions strategy would be different - then it would be worth it to take the tougher class, to show that you are not afraid of stretching yourself with a challenge. But I think it’s too risky for you.</p>
<p>However, in the end you need to look at it from the perspective of what you personally are most comfortable with. Assume that it is a year from now and you are turned down from Barnard …looking back, from the position of rejection, which choice would you be more comfortable with? (That’s how I make all of the hard choices in my life – I envision myself in the future, looking back, and ask whether I will regret the choice if it doesn’t work out as hoped.) So which would you regret more… taking the easy way out with the regular course… or messing up your GPA with the harder course? Obviously, there is always the possibility that you will take the AP course and get an A – or that you will get accepted into Barnard under any of the math scenarios … but of course then it really wouldn’t matter anyway – you are asking about the “what if” options in terms of the very real possibility that one choice is more likely to lead to acceptance than the other.</p>