<p>I've done the barrons tests before. n yes, they are hard. But how hard is the sparknotes tests in relation to the real test? I took the sparknotes Math IIC test 3 online, and i was wondering how hard is it relating to the real one? Because I ran out of time, and normally I don't run out of time, or at least not leave 6 blank.
Thanks</p>
<p>For what it's worth, I thought the sparknotes math2c tests were pretty reasonable. I have not taken the real ones yet, and going to this saturday. I did the first two practice tests on sparknotes and managed to finish in 40 minutes or so, leaving no blank, scores were 780/800.</p>
<p>How hard are the sparknotes tests in comparison to the Barrons tests?</p>
<p>hmm. I took test three. i finished that one faster than the other 2, but i got a 750 -_-</p>
<p>I have yet to take test three, I'm saving it for tomorrow night. However, I did notice some mistakes on the first two tests, but the general difficulty seems to be reasonable.
What kind of math background do you have, for me I was unfamiliar with the polar coordinates and matrices.</p>
<p>hmm if you can ignore all the errors and misprint in spark's tests, most people find them to be pretty reasonable.. I find them to be awful measure of the real test simply because it's and online test and I tend to relax more on the computer. </p>
<p>I took all three tests and had an average of 660, took the real one last month and got 800. (btw my barron scores are about 780-800)</p>
<p>lynda did you also happen to do the physics + chem tests?</p>
<p>I did chem, samething happened with spark's scores. my chem mean score from sparks was about 720, my barron score range was the 750-800 (or was it 780-800 ) one. (I did all three sparks tests and all 4+1 barron ones for chem.. whereas math I only did 3 sparks and 2 barron) my final chem score was 770</p>