<p>@zenhom
***!? u are right </p>
<p>it was 43 or 46 i don’t remember but wht i remember is that it wasn’t 90 degree it was bisected into 2 one with 46 and the other is 43 so it is 89
because the complementary angle was 91
so 89 + 91 = 180</p>
<p>@zenhom
***!? u are right </p>
<p>it was 43 or 46 i don’t remember but wht i remember is that it wasn’t 90 degree it was bisected into 2 one with 46 and the other is 43 so it is 89
because the complementary angle was 91
so 89 + 91 = 180</p>