<p>did anyone get spare..ornate for one of the critical reading? or was it the embellish one</p>
<p>Also, what did everyone get for the decade (.81)^x problem?? did u all round to "increase 1000"?</p>
<p>Can someone please compile a list of final answers to the math section??? I'm freaking out over here??
20 or 36?
2000 or 700?
5/9 or 4/9?</p>
<p>I wrote 20, 2000, and 4/6. I was confident of them until I came here.</p>
<p>I wrote 20, 2000, and 5/9... I highly doubt that all of us really misread the sales question.. that just doesn't happen...</p>
<p>Also, what did everyone get for the decade (.81)^x problem?? did u all round to "increase 1000"?</p>
<p>No. Initial value with t=o is like 500. Then when t=2, it's like 320. So it's a decrease of 180.</p>
<p>I assure you the answer is SEVEN HUNDRED!!!! .. not 2000 </p>
<p>2000 = number of sales</p>
<p>question asked at what compensation [in $$] would this occur...so had to plug in 2000 sales to find compensation .. so 700 = answer!!</p>
<p>I got the 'embellish' one ..</p>
<p>Weve got to come back to this thread once we get our scores and make fun of each other for making the same retarded mistakes, opr make fun of others if you happened to be right.</p>
<p>wow I would've failed the Grammar section if I wrote like my post above in the New SAT.</p>
<p>looooooool =]</p>
<p>All of us didn't misread the sales question. It asked for compensation, which was 700.
The dividisibility probability question is 5/9, let's put that one to bed.
And the combinations of coordinates is 20.</p>
<p>Was anyone else bothered by the fact that the population problem was a decrease of about 172. How the heck did CB round that into a decrease of 180? It was the only answer that made sense, but it's just bad test design.</p>
<p>What really bothers me is that everyone is talking about having two grid ins... I had the same exact problems and passages, but I only had three math sections (2, 6 or 7 was grid in, and the short one). I'm confused...</p>
<p>Im sorry, I probably missed a lot of the conversation. Have we reached a consensus on the juan problem?</p>
<p>vu presus, if you had two 35 question writing sections, then that means you had the writing experimental.</p>
<p>are you sure about that??</p>
<p>I think our math section was pretty difficult. If I just missed one, will I have a shot at an 800 still?</p>
<p>Around how many can one miss and still score a 650-700 for the Math SAT I Reasoning?</p>
<p>I'd probably say that 5 wrong will get you a 700 and 8 or 9 wrong will be a 650.</p>