May 2008 Chemistry

<p>NO WAIT: there were twice as many moles of Pb as I. I remember that. The answer wasn’t .05 it was .025 because I was limiting. That was a trick question I think.</p>

<p>EDIT: Yes to CC.</p>

<p>paper chromo, i got 3-4 ttce…not sure which</p>

<p>yes lol calm down CC, we’ve already stated that ink was chromatography.
and it was 4 TTCE.</p>

<p>^^true that is the correct answeri put it</p>

<p>i skipped 2 and i think i missed 4-6, anyone know what that’ll translate into? 750?</p>

<p>thats a 780 ACCORDING TO PR</p>

<p>Sapience, check a review book for a chart. AND SOMEONE respond to my post 102!</p>

<p>..sweetness…Cornell, here i come!</p>

<p>Ah Yes Cornell. The Community College Of Eilites</p>

<p>hehe, squ33t!!!</p>

<p>huh? that’s a bit preemptive don’t ya think lol? What are your other stats?</p>

<p>princeton, I don’t remember the molarities being different. I also don’t remember an answer choice that was less than .005, since that was E. The others were larger, like .5, .25 etc.</p>

<p>Someone else should confirm/refute.</p>

<p>guys, we need to all talk in 1337 speak, that way only nerds like us can read this thread.</p>

<p>I agree with Echelon on the PbI2 questions. I said .005</p>

<p>can one of you two or Echelon (but I think he left) respond to post number 102 in this thread?</p>

<p>I’m still here princeton - both dolce and I agreed on .005
Hahahaha decided to delete that post, since a few people knew about that and I don’t want any connections being made :P</p>

<p>that makes you leet congrats…</p>

<p>EDIT: DAMMIT. Are you sure? You don’t remember having twice as many moles Pb as I?</p>

<p>same number of moles you n00000blet</p>

<p>WTH is going on? Stop editing guys…lol</p>

<p>loiiiiiii hjhjh</p>