<p>No, I think that he believes that everybody would welcome revolutionary change too.</p>
<p>He doesn’t understand why his Uncle/Aunt aren’t agreeing to it, but he still thinks that they ought be welcoming it. That’s the assumption made.</p>
<p>At the same time, I feel that it could not be public affects because none of that is articulated. I don’t understand how that assumption is made–is he attempting, at all, to advocate public change? Like a political movement? It looks more like some sort of micropolitical, but introverted, revolutionary change.</p>
<p>But also, didn’t he move out from his Uncle/Aunt with the assumption that nothing was wrong? Isn’t that indicative of the fact that he assumed they’d be fine with it?</p>
<p>the criticism of the husband one was 100% that his views ignored the individual traditions of those around him (not the correct phrasing)
essentially that he would not allow others to have their own views, everyone had to accept his opinion (which is pretty ******y XD) or face his wrath
it was choice E</p>
<p>I’m pretty sure it was revolutionary change, because his interaction with relatives showed his assumption, not that he recognized people wouldn’t</p>
<p>what was the one with the wheats and the “invisible wind”</p>
<p>For #1, did you guys put that he was trying to give a compelling plea or something? I don’t think he discovered anything, so it wasn’t a self-revealing monologue, unless he was revealing himself to us, which then ought to have been a revealing monologue =P</p>
<p>For prosody, what did you put that “creeping like common language” represented?</p>
<p>What about for the one where books “ruin themselves and men”, did you guys get “implies they have human qualities”? I felt like the other answers were unsupported.</p>
<p>Does anyone remember the Joe Daggett (OCD Lady) passage? There was a question where one of the answer choices was how he was “too shy to express his love” but I don’t remember what the correct answer for that was.</p>