May 2009 Lit SAT II

<p>No, I think that he believes that everybody would welcome revolutionary change too.</p>

<p>He doesn’t understand why his Uncle/Aunt aren’t agreeing to it, but he still thinks that they ought be welcoming it. That’s the assumption made.</p>

<p>At the same time, I feel that it could not be public affects because none of that is articulated. I don’t understand how that assumption is made–is he attempting, at all, to advocate public change? Like a political movement? It looks more like some sort of micropolitical, but introverted, revolutionary change.</p>

<p>But also, didn’t he move out from his Uncle/Aunt with the assumption that nothing was wrong? Isn’t that indicative of the fact that he assumed they’d be fine with it?</p>

<p>the criticism of the husband one was 100% that his views ignored the individual traditions of those around him (not the correct phrasing)
essentially that he would not allow others to have their own views, everyone had to accept his opinion (which is pretty ******y XD) or face his wrath
it was choice E</p>

<p>I’m pretty sure it was revolutionary change, because his interaction with relatives showed his assumption, not that he recognized people wouldn’t</p>

<p>what was the one with the wheats and the “invisible wind”</p>

<p>I guess I’ll try to figure out this.</p>

<p>So the passages?</p>

<h1>1 -> Prosody?</h1>

<h1>2 -> Country v. City</h1>

<h1>3 -> Censorship</h1>

<h1>4 -> OCD Girl</h1>

<h1>5 -> Wheat</h1>

<p>Is that it? I totally don’t remember this, I focused on hammering out US.</p>

<p>^The one about Prakash and the Jasmine and stuff…</p>

<h1>1 -> Prosody?</h1>

<h1>2 -> Country v. City</h1>

<h1>3 -> Indian Tradition Story</h1>

<h1>4 -> Censorship</h1>

<h1>5 -> OCD Girl</h1>

<h1>6 -> Wheat</h1>

<p>There was the first passage about the person stealing the jewelry from the little ballet girl.</p>

<h1>1 -> Stealing</h1>

<h1>2 -> Prosody</h1>

<h1>3 -> Country v. City</h1>

<h1>4 -> Indian Tradition Story</h1>

<h1>5 -> Censorship</h1>

<h1>6 -> OCD Girl</h1>

<h1>7 -> Wheat</h1>

<p>For #1, did you guys put that he was trying to give a compelling plea or something? I don’t think he discovered anything, so it wasn’t a self-revealing monologue, unless he was revealing himself to us, which then ought to have been a revealing monologue =P</p>

<p>For prosody, what did you put that “creeping like common language” represented?</p>

<p>It was a self-revealing monologue.</p>

<p>It was definitely self-revealing monologue.</p>

<p>Isn’t he pleaing with us so that we believe that he is not bad, but he does so out of necessity, IE his poverty?</p>

<p>I just looked up what the terms mean and I guess you guys are right :[</p>

<p>I have no clue, however, if what I said is possibly true too Dx (sometimes you have to pick the more specific answer?).</p>

<p>It wasn’t a plea…or exactly to anyone.</p>

<p>It was a monologue in which he showed he wanted to rationalize his situation and revealed how he felt…</p>

<p>Was prakash “uncaring of the emotions of others” or “lingering in tradition”?</p>

<p>I said lingering…he obviously cared for Jasmine…</p>

<p>:) </p>

<p>What about for the one where books “ruin themselves and men”, did you guys get “implies they have human qualities”? I felt like the other answers were unsupported.</p>

<p>I thought today’s SAT Lit was okay, just some of the passages were maddening. How many did you guys leave blank? I left 2.</p>

<p>yea i think its definitely “human quality” 99% suree</p>

<p>Does anyone remember the Joe Daggett (OCD Lady) passage? There was a question where one of the answer choices was how he was “too shy to express his love” but I don’t remember what the correct answer for that was.</p>

<p>I believe this was answered earlier; people said it was nervous and annoyed?</p>

<p>Ah okay, thanks.</p>

<p>There is also one with like, “Cold front like a common language” [sp] what did people put for that one?</p>