<p>Since it doesn't look line anyone made one yet?</p>
<p>I had an experimental writing. Did the real one have the passage about airships or stubbornness and juggling?</p>
<p>Emily Dickinson only published...</p>
<p>yeah i had the stubbornness and juggling(i had a math experimental)…what was the dickenson one again? i already forgot haha</p>
<p>I had juggling, no airships. and I had Emily.</p>
<p>I had no experimental though</p>
<p>Last section 10 last 3 answers were D lol.</p>
<p>last 3 for section 10 was D D D.
confirm?</p>
<p>The last section was pretty tough.</p>
<p>REmember that sea question? Did you go with the original?</p>
<p>And also that one about the cats, did you go with “their” or “its” ?</p>
<p>Anybody get no errors for any of them? (I didnt get any no errors…)</p>
<p>@ This ; For the cats question, I said something along the lines of: Each of the cats has a kink in its tail?</p>
<p>yea i also said </p>
<p>Each cat had a kink in its tail</p>
<p>I got a bunch on the last section, like 3.</p>
<p>Writing this time was hard, </p>
<p>Also #28 was NE the one with had had
and #27 was also NE</p>
<h1>29 was dinstitvely which shouldve been distintive.</h1>
<p>that question <x wrote=“” 10=“” plays,=“” 9=“” of=“” which=“” were=“” set=“” in=“” x=“” place,=“” and=“” each=“” was=“” different=“” time=“” period=“”> I think i put down E but not confident at all. Anyone got an answer for this?</x></p>
<p>YES! 27 NE!! </p>
<p>How about the last section?</p>
<p>Did you get any NE’s?</p>
<p>I put down B for the plays one. But I might be remembering wrong.</p>
<p>It was the one that said, 9 were set in blah blah, and all were set in different times.</p>
<p>No, #28 with “had had” had an error (lol).
It said something about the guy being from mexican descent, but it’s idiomatically incorrect. It should have been “of mexican descent” or heritage or whatever.</p>
<p>Wait, I had writing in both section 3 and 7, I don’t remember which one had juggling and which had airships.</p>
<p>^ No #28 was NE. I’ve seen this question from another test. Also according to " SAT Logic". An error as blatant as that on a question like #28 could not have been the answer. It was NE.</p>
<h1>29 was distinctively confirmed</h1>
<p>what was 27?</p>
<p>no the had had one was NE…</p>
<p>that is what i put RustGust. It said from, should’ve been of i think.</p>
<p>what was question 29 about?</p>