<p>Was accomplished artists an answer choice for that question? I thought I got that for a completely different question. THATS WHAT IT IS. We’re debating two questions as one. Cause I clearly remember putting down accomplished artists for one and data for another. Or I’m also delusional…</p>
<p>I SPECIFICALLY remember that for the guthrie question there was three choices: data, evidence, and accomplished artists…
dont remember anything else. too sad.</p>
<p>It wasn’t experimental, I had WR experimental.
And yeah, I think it was the obstreperous one. I was between that and another answer and went with obstreperous</p>
<p>Okay I’m thinking of the question about Michelangelo and the scientists then.</p>
<p>Like for the accomplished artists answer. Along those lines at least</p>
<p>can someone give me the argument that indefinable aspect is making?, i was really sure it was relentless force…</p>
<p>I don’t where that paragraph is, but it’s back there. And we clearly agreed that it was an unrelenting force of nature.</p>
<p>i understand that but that wasn’t my question… i was asking what the argument for indefinable aspect was…</p>
<p>ahh I’m sorry for my rudeness. cut me a break cause I’m bad at reading? 
And I don’t have an argument or indefinable aspect cause I’m a pro-unrelenting dude here.</p>
<p>their saying that indefinable, which means hard to define or whatever, means that the crowd was hard to define because they blended in with the previous descriptions of buildings as trees, sky as whatever, blah blah blah, part of the landscape</p>
<p>but i dont agree, it was definitely relentless</p>
<p>All right…Is this year’s CR supposed to be easy or hard???
How do you guys think the curve will be???</p>
<p>just guessing…</p>
<p>some say easy some say hard
but overall it should’ve been pretty average or maybe a bit towards difficult</p>
<p>About the aesthetic power one, is the answer really aesthetic power seeing that both passages addressed it?</p>
<p>I think I have two doubts here:
- has the one about aesthetic power been settled for sure yet? I chose diversity of content, can we discuss it?
- have we already agreed on the one with" general agreement" yet? Is “cautious acceptance” still possible?</p>
<p>sparks and smokes is for sure futility - i think that jazz is too much emphasis on the theoretical part , why didnt anyone mention that. cause the author states - musicians spend years learning instrumental technique and theory …, but we do it differently</p>
<p>WAIT WAIT WAIT. I don’t think author one would agree right away. He would definitely accept the idea, cause he said he it didn’t matter who the art was done by. Since he deeply respected the artwork he would have doubts, but would accept gurtie’s view eventually because of his stance. General agreement does not fit. Even though I put mild skepticism, I stand by cautious acceptance now.</p>
<p>^dude, that exactly is the meaning of general agreement… The author doesn’t thoroughly agree, or doesn’t mind most of the parts, but he minds the general and necessary ideas. it just means he doesn’t mind the details.</p>
<p>you’re just assuming he has doubts…the passage STATES that he doesn’t mind, not that he is cautious.</p>
<p>got one CR reading question which has some choices like frastration, revultion and blar blar?</p>
<p>@marching91in
that’s from the venice passage which was the experimental
and it was revulsion
and the answer was frustration i think</p>