<p>"What’s the one where is like “scientists find new ways of generating power.”</p>
<p>I think I put E. No error on that one."</p>
<p>wrong. It was “instead” or anther transition word in the the middle of the sentence (I think answer C).</p>
<p>which one was the scientist one?</p>
<p>Uh oh…I thought the Diamond one was A. It started with “Thanks to…” something, and I thought that it should have been “Due to.”</p>
<p>the diamond one was subject/verb disagreement</p>
<p>Are you sure? because “it” modified a diamond correctly</p>
<p>not “it” - it was at the end of the sentence, sorry I don’t remember exactly, but I went through that one very carefully, I’m sure there was an error. </p>
<p>Or at least 99% sure.</p>
<p>The error for the Diamond was 100% “makes it.” It had to be “make it” because the subject was the diamonds “exceptional physical properties,” so it requires a plural verb, make.</p>
<p>thank you cortana - exactly.</p>
<p>Dang it, dang it, dang it…writing went swimmingly except for the improving paragraphs apparently. I put that the biology sentence should be moved directly after sentence 7 (it made sense…kinda) and for some reason didn’t bother to consider omitting it. Grr…hopefully I can get a 9+ on the essay to keep 800…</p>
<p>My essay agreed that a happy medium of rules and limitations is good and contributes to happiness, but I said thattoo many rules, or too little rules can take away from happiness. My first body paragraph used 1984 as an example of why too many rules is bad (it was a dystopia). My second body was why too little regulations is also bad and can ruin happiness. I used the stock market crashing as an example where there wasn’t enough regulations and it led to the economy being full of “fake money” (credit) aka, the great depression, which obviously was not a happy time.</p>
<p>Is that an okay take on the prompt?</p>
<p>gahhh… so we have lemons, scientists. as no errors. and delete sentence and Indeed researchers…</p>
<p>nyjets - that’s exactly what I did. I qualified it with 1984 (too many rules) and with the Spanish Anarchist Revolution (too few rules).</p>
<p>Wharton - Nice. Yeah I thought 1984 was perfect. That’s a good historical example too.</p>
<p>“I put that the biology sentence should be moved directly after sentence 7 (it made sense…kinda)”</p>
<p>I put that as well, and I’m fairly sure its right.</p>
<p>the biology sentence should have been deleted, it was a random personal interjection. almost 100% certain on that one.</p>
<p>Sentence 7 seemed irrelevant to the passage, and therefore should have been omitted? I could totally be wrong about this but it seemed like an obvious choice.</p>
<p>Yeah that sentence definitely should have been removed.</p>
<p>misspelled Kyrgyzstan?where are from? because i am from there too</p>
<p>Can we talk about the “scientists finding new ways of generating energy” question? Because I was almost certain there weren’t any errors on that one.</p>
<p>was it just me or was this thread down for a while</p>