<p>I moved on. I only brought it up here because you tried to claim you havent been challenging consolidated answers. nice try ‘bro.’</p>
<p>CR Consolidated List</p>
<h2>36/67</h2>
<p>Sentence Completions</p>
<h2>12/19</h2>
<p>ostensibly(not salient)
squalid(not cataclysmic)
tycoon/philanthropist
succinctly
archeaologist
ferocity/contentious (not accuracy/inexact)
fanciful/exploit(about children’s books being inaccurate)
reticent(timid employees)
nourishment
captivated
commonplace/startling
nominal</p>
<hr>
<p>Passage Based Questions</p>
<h2>24/48</h2>
<p>1) chimpanzees
2) physics string theory</p>
<h2>3) stolen diamond w/ lawyer and butler</h2>
<p>2)author of passage 2 would be in complete agreement
3)butler was deferential at lawyer
prudent (mom going to college with daughter)
typical answer(daughter’s italics remarks)
3)‘want’ means lack of
2)superhuman computer represents lack of technology to use it as a tool
2)passage 2 would say that the mathematicians and physicians should pursue different avenues
3)“as soon as he turned his back” showed his eagerness
3)the quote from robert crusoe represented an omen
3)growing sense of alarm(in lawyer)/moment of perplexity
3)Only repeated meant brevity of interval
1)look in chimpanzee’s eye/raising of hand shows relation between empathy and technology
3)cost means personal toll
1)chimpanzees were cracking nuts
3)puffery was self-regard and exaggeration
lying passage - qualification
welsh passage - her nationality wasn’t her most important characteristic
3)innocent people were defamed
2)passage 1 says reason string theory is hard to prove is because of complexity of mathematics
2)fits and starts was sudden bursts
2)scope and outcome
(frida kahlo) playing a role allows you to express your inner feelings more
2)Authors agree that in its current state the string theory is incomplete
(frida kahlo) towards the end of her life she started wearing more to hide her growing frailty</p>
<h2>(frida kahlo) mask and frame question? (two different personalities or sides)(contradicting purposes)</h2>
<p>Passage 3 is here: <a href=“http://collins.thefreelibrary.com/The-Moonstone/1-1[/url]”>http://collins.thefreelibrary.com/The-Moonstone/1-1</a>
Passage 2 is here:
TWO STRING THEORY PASSAGES:
Passage 1: <a href=“http://books.google.com/books?id=8QY...page&q&f=false[/url]”>http://books.google.com/books?id=8QY...page&q&f=false</a></p>
<h2>Passage 2: <a href=“http://books.google.com/books?id=pcJ...page&q&f=false[/url]”>http://books.google.com/books?id=pcJ...page&q&f=false</a></h2>
<p>Probable curve: <a href=“http://www.erikthered.com/tutor/SAT-...est-Curves.pdf[/url]”>http://www.erikthered.com/tutor/SAT-...est-Curves.pdf</a></p>
<h2>It will be on the easy side probably in the 3rd or 4th slot.</h2>
<p>I’m leaving guys - someone else keep the List updated.<br>
I give up on CR…3rd and final time taking SAT and I still cant break 700…yet I have gotten 800s on the other 2 sections already…doesn’t make sense why I suck so much…
Guess I’ll stick with my ACT Score then(35)
But on the bright side I never have to take another SAT test again. In my life. Yessssss.</p>
<p>Good Luck on the scores everyone. I’ve got to move on to APs.</p>
<p>sorry but can someone answer my question about what the sentence was for nominal?</p>
<p>it was collective for the diamond passage I think, for the lawyer wanted to know how EACH person was PERSONALLY involved with the diamond, deeming him able to retrace steps in hopes of recovering the diamond.</p>
<p>sorry faith, i dont remember</p>
<p>oh by the way, since there seems to be a discrepancy between “moment of perplexity” and “growing sense of alarm”. I want to mention that beatleridge was confused the entire damn time, so it couldn’t be just a moment of perplexity-- it was a more prolonged period of befuddlement.</p>
<p>it wasnt collective. he wanted the butler (narrator) to write it all.</p>
<p>@jetscm4ev, no he explictly said that he wanted everyone to write a personal account</p>
<p>@gthopeful: no, the lawer wanted everyone to write the part he was aware of, no more.</p>
<p>right on the money aljhori</p>
<p>Something about didnt want to leave it up to hearsay in the diamond passage. I remember getting that as an answer.</p>
<p>@lucerivita</p>
<p>the answer choice your statement referred to is A, if that helps anyone</p>
<p>the other conflicting choice was C</p>
<p>@faith17
the nominal sentence was something about a book and the title had something to do with parrots, but really it was about humans</p>
<p>^yeah, that was the one with speculate. i got that too</p>
<p>wasn’t that ostensibly?</p>
<p>what about when he said that the butler had been through it all? he said he wanted it from him.</p>
<p>Something about didnt want to leave it up to hearsay in the diamond passage. I remember getting that as an answer. Can anyone confirm this, Im pretty sure I didnt see it on the consolidated list.</p>
<p>no the parrot one was “ostensibly”. I do not remember the sentence about nominal</p>
<p>he said he wanted the butler to write his own account because he knew it well but i distinctly remember the passage stating that they should write no more than what they know therefore each person must write only what they remember and compile it</p>
<p>@faith17
um…yes, yes it was. forget what i said…i don’t remember the nominal sentence.</p>