MAY SAT Discussion

<p>the indian passage just killed meh.
anyone remembers Q or A from the shorter passages?</p>

<p>why are you giving the answers to the people who take it on Sunday?</p>

<p>sunday's ppl are going to have different ones, no?</p>

<p>procastiNate</p>

<p>was the thing you said in bold the right answer but reworded? I put something similar to that which is in bold.</p>

<p>procrastinate- was the bold answers D or E?</p>

<p>it was either D or E and i put D</p>

<p>passage two offers an explanation for a problem presented in passage one</p>

<p>yeah yeah thats what i put.</p>

<p>hey guys, are you sure about the obscure/discriminate one, and are you sure about the...uh...what was it...cacophony one? cause that seemed way too easy for a hard question. so i put a different answer, interpreting abhorred (or whatever that word was, i dotn even remember) differently. i'm gonna slit my throat when i changed my answer just because it didtn seem hard enough.</p>

<p>its 100% cacophony
i checkd the dictionary when i got home</p>

<p>chone,</p>

<p>i hope you realized that this entire time we've been arguing about the same answer. haha</p>

<p>elliott,</p>

<p>whatever. i got it right. sorry to sound so blunt, but i'm really zoned right now. <em>_</em></p>

<p>well yeah i know what cacophony means, but i put harmonious because if you interpret abashed or wahtever to mean incredibly shocked instead of hte negatively connoted appalled, it makes sense as well. they were shocked it was so good. to say that the YOUTH orchestra was so bad the that even the NEWEST were shocked makes no sense - to say they were so good that they were shocked is more valid. it all depends on how you analyze abashed...if that was even the word. i cant remember. i'm probably wrong, i was just showing my viewpoint. ETS is weird sometimes, you know.</p>

<p>if you interpret abashed to mean shocked without a negative connotation then you're interpreting it wrong :P</p>

<p>and the judges were discriminating, not obscure. why are so many people confused by that, obscure doesnt even make any sense in that sentence</p>

<p>k1zuna</p>

<p>.... I had mellifluous for that one because it means sweetly flowing and melodic, I think. Cacophony was a bad thing. I think the sentence was hinting to a positive word...</p>

<p>I got it down to mellifluous, cacophony, and the other one, and took a blind guess because of the phon root. Yay = )</p>

<p>nah thats exactly why it wasn't harmonious. because if the statement warranted a positive response, both mellifluous and harmonious would work. but because two answers can't be right, it's asking fore a negative word.</p>

<p>And the newest members would be abashed because not even they expected to be so bad.</p>

<p>tyler, your answer makes more sense, but ETS is weird. you can never be sure. they both had correct pieces, neither make 100% full sense.</p>

<p>same for the other one. obscure...an obscure person can mean a person who judges based on obscure criteria. its a stretch...albeit, plausible. especially in the eyes of the creeps who write these things.</p>

<p>for the library one...it asked what the girl's reaction took the library's ceiling said about the girl...</p>

<p>did anyone say that it was like : "it showed her appreciation for the libraries focus on higher education"</p>

<p>or what did everyone get?</p>

<p>why don't we just wait till may 30 =_______________=!
...ok i'll shut up.</p>

<p>also...for the yawning one...did anyone get "the power of suggestion" for an answer?</p>

<p>i put power of suggestion too.</p>

<p>yeah yawning made others yawn, physical suggestion.</p>

<p>anyone remembers the question to that yawning problem?</p>