<p>This system aparently puts a lot of value on class size, something that works against McGill.</p>
<p>One word of advice I've heard that makes sense is "go for a good fit, not for the name of the school". In other words, visit the school, meet some students and faculty, and see if it "fits".</p>
<p>The other part of the story is cost. I'm pretty sure McGill is a bargain for its quality compared to the list price of US schools, including state-supported US schools. The most selective US schools have no merit scholarships and cost about $US42,000/year.</p>
<p>What the relevant question is though, how are McGill graduates doing as far as acceptance into US graduate schools and professional schools? Are they being rejected because they "came from McGill"? Clearly, different departments and different academic areas (science, law, business, etc.) will have different levels of success.</p>
<p>I don't have information on this for McGill one way or the other, but I found some regarding Queen's which might be relevant. I read that Princeton University recruits undergraduates from Queen's for their graduate program in physics. Also, the current president of Princeton is a Queen's graduate. </p>
<p>If you do a google search on the usenet newsgroups, you will find these comments from Queens graduates who are in graduate school in the US (one at Princeton, one at UC-Berkeley):</p>
<p>" UBC, U of T, Queen's, and McGill are all top tier (though not comparable to, say, the ivies, berkeley, etc.). Entrance standards are usually ~85-90% HS average. Perhaps you should ask those who have experience with graduate school admissions decisions what they think of these Canadian schools. As an example, in last year's graduating group of physics students (~40 people) here (Queen's), graduate placements included: Stanford (2), Princeton (2), Caltech (1). No one was rejected by any school except MIT, which is known for ridiculously stringent quotas on international students. This year's graduating physics class has gotten admits at Harvard, Princeton, Cambridge, Yale, MIT, U of I, Cornell.... At a recent visit to Harvard for recent physics admits, there were prospectives from Queen's, UBC, and McGill (though no U of T). Nearly everyone else was from what one would consider a top US institution (e.g. ivies, MIT, Caltech, etc.). Unless the admissions officers are clueless, they seem to believe that an undergraduate education at these Canadian institutions is excellent preparation, in particular for graduate work. "</p>
<p>" Same goes for our [Queen's] EE programs - in a graduating class that is primarily focused on employment, I know of eleven people who have applied for graduate school in the US. Acceptance stats so far:</p>
<p>Stanford (4/5, 3 fellowships)
Berkeley (2/5, 2 fellowships)
Caltech (2/2, 1 fellowship)
UIUC (1/1)
Michigan (1/2, 1 fellowship)
MIT (2/3, 2 fellowships)
Cornell (2/3, 2 fellowships) "</p>
<p>I for one would be interested in what McGill's placement has been in US graduate schools.</p>