<p>i couldn’t get their methodology for undergraduate ranking. I didn’t even recognized those names! can you clarify it a little bit? (btw, it turns out that McGill still rocks! :))</p>
<p>“Students and classes” is determined by the amount of awards students at the university have received and by student-faculty ratios.</p>
<p>“Faculty” is determined by research grants and awards faculty at the university have received.</p>
<p>“Resources” is determined by the operating budget and total research dollars.</p>
<p>“Student support” is determined by the portion of the university’s budget dedicated to student services and scholarships.</p>
<p>“Library” is determined by expenses (?), acquisitions, and then total holdings and holdings per student.</p>
<p>“Reputation” is determined by a national survey of employers, high school councillors, principals, etc., getting their opinion of each Canadian university.</p>
<p>Those individual rankings and the statistical breakdown can be found in the magazine. But that’s the gist of the methodology. It’s true that most universities have boycotted Maclean’s, forcing them to use data from a few years ago (which has once again put McGill ahead of U of T).</p>
<p>I honestly hope their financial situation improves soon. But seeing how little state funding they are currently getting, McGill is seriously overperforming (or appears so).</p>
<p>actually mcgill has extremely low tuition rate. For Quebec students, it is about $3000 a year. That is nothing. For out of province Canadians, it is around $7000.</p>
<p>mcgill needs to triple to quadruple its tuition to be competitive.</p>