<p>Hey guys,
Is it just me, or is the science section of the Mcgraw very vague and stupid?
I just feel like it is worded and constructed much differently than the Real ACT book.</p>
<p>I found it much too easy. I scored a 35 on the practice test for science; on the Real ACT's, I usually do much poorer. (Like, 27. Not even kidding.)</p>
<p>I think it's hard. :(</p>
<p>The science section in Mcgraw hill is much wordier than the actual act. The actual ACT contains alot more graph sections than does Mcgraw hill. Another difference is that even when Mcgraw Hill uses tables and graphs there are very few gimmy questions. On the real act you should expect to encounter 3 sections that are absolute gimmy sections, 2 that are moderate, and 2 that are just plain hard.</p>