Medicinal marijuana

Colleges and Universities A-Z University of California - Los Angeles
1

<p>Are Students who are cannabis patients allowed to medicinate on campus?</p>

2

<p>No. </p>

<p>10char</p>

3

<p>^
Your ignorance sickens me. Judgmental much?</p>

4

<p>If there is a prescription for it, I wouldn’t see why not any more than a person not being allowed to take asthma medication on campus. But if you have an illness that you need medicinal marijuana for, I can’t see why you would be in school as opposed to someplace more relaxed so your body could avoid high-stress situations.</p>

5

<p>Just bring your paperwork with you while on campus. Do it off to the side somewhere that there’s less people (this way there is less of a chance that you will get hassled). If anybody asks about it, show them your medical card and stuff and you should be fine.</p>

6

<p>A positive attitude along with a healthy dose of unwavering faith followed up by extraordinary effort. That combination will create any miracle in your life :)</p>

7

<p>I haven’t been on this forum in a minute, but nah you can’t “legally” have it. Club cards dont work in drug free zones such as schools and federal buildings. Even if they do catch you, your case will most likely be dropped in court if you have a medical card. If prop 19 passes though, this will be a different story</p>

8

<p>prop 19 omg. please pass.</p>

9

<p>Prop 19 FTW, and f you humorUS for being ignorant the past three presidents have said they smoked weed before although one didn’t inhale, allegedly</p>

10

<p>are you kidding?.. and you probably think you’re smart and high and mighty because you don’t smoke pot, right?</p>

11

<p>humorus, im pretty sure i can be high 24/7 and still beat you on any test.</p>

12

<p>LOL!</p>

<p>Thanks for the science report humor us.</p>

<p>Imagination > knowledge according to Albert Einstein</p>

13

<p>he got that statement off another forum</p>

14

<p>alcohol does more damage to the brain than weed does</p>

15

<p>This is completely unrelated to this discussion but I decided to run HumorUS’s post through the LOLspeak generator:</p>

<p>THAR IZ INDISPUTABLE EVIDENCE DAT TEH ADMINISTRASHUN OV EXOGENOUS CANNABINOIDZ KATALYZEZ HIPPOCAMPAL NEUROGENESIS. DIS MEANZ MOAR, ALBEIT MARGINALLY MOAR, NEURONS GROW AN THUS TEH CALCULATIV COMPLEXITY OV TEH HIPPOCAMPUS INCREASEZ; IT CAN HANDLE MOAR CALCULASHUNS. HOWEVR, IF WAN BELIEVEZ IN DA WELL-ESTABLISHD HEBBIAN THEORY OV SYNAPTIC PLASTICITY, DEN IT BE PERSONAL TRUTH DAT EXOGENOUS CANNABINOIDZ DECREASE TEH COMMUNICATIV EFFICIENCY OV CELLS IN DA HIPPOCAMPUS. TEH FORMR STATEMENT STEMS FRUM DIS FACT: EXOGENOUS CANNABINOIDZ TEMPORARILY CAUSE TEH MAJORITY OV ELECTRICAL ACTIVITY IN DA HIPPOCAMPUS 2 STOP, AN SO TEH HEBBIAN THEORY DAT “CELLS WHICH FIRE TOGETHR, WIRE TOGETHR” DICTATEZ DECREASE IN COMMUNICATIV EFFICIENCY WIF TEH ADMINISTRASHUN OV EXOGENOUS CANNABINOIDZ 2 TEH CNS.</p>

<p>TEH CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE OV THEES OPPOSIN FENOMENON (INCREASD CALCULATIV COMPLEXICTY VS. DECREASD COMMUNICATIV EFFICIENCY) IZ SUBJECT OV GREAT SCIENTIFIC DEBATE, AS IZ TEH DOSIN SCHEDULE WHICH OFFERS OPTIMAL EQUILIBRIUM. I BLEEV SUM PEEPS CUD HAS LOCATD DOSIN SCHEDULE VRY NEAR DIS EQUILIBRIUM. AT SUCH DOSIN SCHEDULE, TEH STEREOTYPICAL DISRUPSHUN OV MEMS FUNCSHUNALITY IZ TRANZIENT AN AFTR TEH HIGH SUBSIDEZ, IT APPEARS DAT WUT PERSISTS IZ HIPPOCAMPUS WHICH FUNCSHUNS BETTR THAN BASELINE. LOTZ DA PEEPS, IN MAH OPINION, USE 2 HIGH OV DOSE AN AS RESULT SUFFR FRUM MEMS IMPAIRMENT AN LERNIN DOWN-REGULASHUN (PROBABLY DUE 2 DECREASD COMMUNICATIV EFFICIENCY TWEEN CELLS OV TEH HIPPOCAMPUS AN POSIBLY TEH PREFRONTAL CORTEX). IN ANY EVENT, QUANTITATIVELY SPEAKIN, TEH UP-REGULATD LERNIN IZ NOT TERRIBLY SIGNIFICANT, BUT IT CANT HURT AS LONG AS UR BEHAVIORAL SCHEDULE PERMITS UR PRODUCTIVITY NOT 2 SUFFR.</p>

<p>I BLEEV ALL OTHR FACTORS R MOAR INSIGNIFICANT. TEH TEMPORARY INCREASD COMMUNICASHUN TWEEN TEH HEMISFEREZ OV TEH BRAIN SEEMS 2 POSESS LIL LONG-TURM THERAPEUTIC USE. IT SEEMS 2 BE ONLY OV TEMPORARY USE IN INCREASIN COMPLEXITY OV ABSTRACT THINKIN CAPABILITIEZ AN SENSORY PERCEPSHUN. I HAS SEEN NO RESEARCH PAPERS INDICATIN LONG-TURM UPREGULASHUN OV THINKIN ABILITIEZ, AN 2 TEH BEST OV MAH ABILITIEZ, BASD ON MAH PERSONAL EXPERIENCE I CANT HONESTLY ASSERT TEH EXISTENCE OV LONG-TURM BENEFIT IN DIS REGARD EITHR.</p>

<p>TL;DOCTA: MARIJUANA DECREASEZ INTELLIGENCE. </p>

<p>.
.
.</p>

<p>Personally I couldn’t read it in English but I seem to be doing alright with this version.</p>

16

<p>^I just lol’d. A whole lot.</p>

17

<p>He said decreases intelligence, not knowledge.</p>

18

<p>IN CONTRAST 2 DIS AITHUSERIAN ETHICS OV ALIENASHUN IN DA SYMBOLIC PROCES WITHOUT SUBJECT’, WE CUD DENOTE TEH ETHICS IMPLID BY LACANIAN PSYCHOANALYSIS AS DAT OV SEPARASHUN. TEH FAMOUS LACANIAN MOTTO NOT 2 GIV WAI ON WAN’S DESIRE [NE PAS CIDR SUR SON DESIR] — IZ AIMD AT TEH FACT DAT WE MUST NOT OBLITERATE TEH DISTANCE SEPARATIN TEH REAL FRUM ITZ SYMBOLIZASHUN: IT DIS SURPLUS OV TEH REAL OVAR EVRY SYMBOLIZASHUN DAT FUNCSHUNS AS TEH OBJECT—CAUSE OV DESIRE. 2 COME 2 TERMS WIF DIS SURPLUS (OR, MOAR PRECISELY, LEFTOVR) MEANZ 2 ACKNOWLEDGE FUNDA¬MENTAL DEADLOCK (‘ANTAGONISM’), KERNEL RESISTIN SYMBOLIC INTEGRASHUN— DISOLUSHUN. TEH BEST WAI 2 LOCATE SUCH AN ETHICAL POSISHUN IZ VIA ITZ OPPOSISHUN 2 TEH TRADISHUNAL MARXIST NOSHUN OV SOSHUL ANTAGONISM. DIS TRADISHUNAL NOSHUN IMPLIEZ 2 INTERCONNECTD FEATUREZ: (1) THAR EXISTS CERTAIN FUNDAMENTAL ANTAGONISM POSESSIN AN ONTOLOGICAL PRIORITY 2 ‘MEDIATE’ ALL OTHR ANTAGONISMS, DETERMININ THEIR PLACE AN THEIR SPECIFIC WEIGHT (CLAS ANTAGONISM, ECONOMIC EXPLOITASHUN); (2) HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT BRINGS BOUT, IF NOT NECESITY, AT LEAST AN ‘OBJECTIV POSIB¬ILITY’ OV SOLVIN DIS FUNDAMENTAL ANTAGONISM AN, IN DIS WAI, MEDIATIN ALL OTHR ANTAGONISMS — 2 RECALL TEH WELL-KNOWN MARXIST FORMULASHUN, TEH SAME LOGIC WHICH DROOV MANKIND INTO ALIENASHUN AN CLAS DIVISHUN ALSO CREATEZ TEH CONDISHUN 4 ITZ ABOLISHUN — ‘DYE WUNDE SCHLIEST DER SPER NUT, DERSIESEHIUG’ (TEH WOUND CAN BE HEALD ONLY BY TEH SPEAR WHICH MADE IT) — AS WAGNR, MARX’S CONTEMPORARY, SED THRU TEH MOUTH OV PARSIFAL. IT UPON TEH UNITY OV THEES 2 FEATUREZ DAT TEH MARXIST NOSHUN OV TEH REVOLUSHUN, OV TEH REVOLUSHUNARY SITUASHUN, IZ FOUNDD: SITUASHUN OV METAFORICAL CONDENSASHUN IN WHICH IT FINALLY BECOMEZ CLEAR 2 TEH EVRYDAI CONSCIOUSNES DAT IT NOT POSIBLE 2 SOLVE ANY PARTICULAR QUEZ¬SHUN WITHOUT SOLVIN THEM ALL — DAT IZ, WITHOUT SOLVIN TEH FUNDAMENTAL QUESHUN WHICH EMBODIEZ TEH ANTAGONISTIC CHARACTR OV TEH SOSHUL TOTALITY. IN ‘NORMAL’, PRE-REVOLUSHUNARY STATE OV THINGS, EVRYBODY IZ FIGHTIN HIS OWN PARTICULAR BATTLEZ (WERKERS R STRIKIN 4 BETTR WAGEZ, FEMINISTS R FIGHTIN 4 DA RIGHTS OV WOMEN, DEMOCRATS 4 POLITICAL AN SOSHUL FREEDOMS, ECOLOGISTS AGAINST TEH EXPLOITASHUN OV NACHUR, PARTICIPANTS IN DA PEACE MOVEMENTS AGAINST TEH DANGR OV WAR, AN SO ON). MARXISTS R USIN ALL THEIR SKILL AN ADROITNES OV ARGUMENT 2 CONVINCE TEH PARTICI¬PANTS IN THEES PARTICULAR STRUGGLEZ DAT TEH ONLY REAL SOLUSHUN 2 THEIR PROBLEM IZ 2 BE FINDZ IN DA GLOBAL REVOLUSHUN: AS LONG AS SOSHUL RELASHUNS R DOMINATD BY CAPITAL, THAR WILL ALWAYS BE SEKSISM IN RELASHUNS TWEEN TEH SEKSEZ, THAR WILL ALWAYS BE THREAT OV GLOBAL WAR, THAR WILL ALWAYS BE DANGR DAT POLITICAL AN SOSHUL FREEDOMS WILL BE SUSPENDD, NACHUR ITSELF WILL ALWAYS REMAIN AN OBJECT OV RUTHLES EXPLOITASHUN. . . . TEH GLOBAL REVOLUSHUN WILL DEN ABOLISH TEH BASIC SOSHUL ANTAGONISM, ENABLIN TEH FORMASHUN OV TRANZPARENT, RASHUNALLY GOVERND SOCIETY.</p>

<ul>
<li>Slavoj Žižek</li>
</ul>